2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2007. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends February 21st. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
|
View Poll Results: Desktop Environment of the Year
|
|
KDE
|
  
|
727 |
52.08% |
|
Gnome
|
  
|
498 |
35.67% |
|
XFCE
|
  
|
160 |
11.46% |
|
GNUstep
|
  
|
2 |
0.14% |
|
rox
|
  
|
9 |
0.64% |
 |
|
01-05-2008, 10:21 AM
|
#16
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2008
Posts: 39
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Electro
Xfce is a Window Mananger. When ROX is included, Xfce becomes a Window and Desktop Mananger.
|
You keep saying that but not expanding on it....
What is xfce missing to be considered a desktop manager?
What exactly is missing that ROX adds to it?
|
|
|
|
01-05-2008, 02:29 PM
|
#17
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Farm near Seba Beach, Alberta, Canada.
Distribution: Knoppix, Pocket Linux.
Posts: 27
Rep:
|
Gnome, KDE,and XFCE
Gnome, is to big for my Laptop (which is currently only running 98), so I am going to use XFCE. However Gnome is still my favorite. My problem with KDE is that it is to much like the Mac and Windows GUIs (eg: primitive yet flashy). I like the K programs better then the Gnome programs though. 
|
|
|
|
01-05-2008, 03:26 PM
|
#18
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2008
Posts: 39
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Good Riddance 98
Gnome, is to big for my Laptop
|
huh? how is it too big?
|
|
|
|
01-05-2008, 04:10 PM
|
#19
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Farm near Seba Beach, Alberta, Canada.
Distribution: Knoppix, Pocket Linux.
Posts: 27
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by souneedalink
huh? how is it too big?
|
Requires to much memory, KDE will barely run. XFCE should be fine though. To make this clear I am running a very old laptop. 
|
|
|
|
01-05-2008, 06:51 PM
|
#20
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2008
Posts: 39
Rep:
|
I find xfce to use about as much memory as gnome. Often it isnt the environment but the apps you choose. My laptop is 700mhz PIII and I use gnome, of course I have memory bumped up to 384mb. But at startup it uses about 85mb according to the free command.
|
|
|
|
01-05-2008, 07:40 PM
|
#21
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: pl_PL.lodz
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 370
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by souneedalink
I find xfce to use about as much memory as gnome. Often it isnt the environment but the apps you choose. My laptop is 700mhz PIII and I use gnome, of course I have memory bumped up to 384mb. But at startup it uses about 85mb according to the free command.
|
It depends how you use XFCE, you can strip its components to minimum, so its memory usage will look like that:
Code:
VSZ RSS COMMAND
14080 9300 xfwm4
23448 12020 xfce4-panel
19836 9512 xfce4-menu-plugin
Entire HOWTO is here if you are interested:
http://bsdforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=47695
|
|
|
|
01-05-2008, 07:49 PM
|
#22
|
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: u.s.a
Distribution: mepis 3.4.3,antix Lysistrata,linuxmint 4.0xfce,debian4.0,ultimate edition xmas
Posts: 78
Rep:
|
fluxbox is the best no matter what.antix Lysistrata is the greatest.
|
|
|
|
01-05-2008, 08:01 PM
|
#23
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2008
Posts: 39
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vermaden
It depends how you use XFCE, you can strip its components to minimum, so its memory usage will look like that:
|
I actually use the xfce panel on gnome but I prefer not to use the menu-plugin but rather to have launchers for my most used programs and use appfinder when I need one of the other apps.
I assume that kills all forms of session/settings management though? I am not sure most users would find that acceptable.
So you feel that would be a lot lighter than metacity and a lite panel, assuming this is still considered to be gnome?
Last edited by souneedalink; 01-05-2008 at 08:02 PM.
|
|
|
|
01-05-2008, 08:25 PM
|
#24
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: pl_PL.lodz
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 370
Rep:
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by souneedalink
I actually use the xfce panel on gnome but I prefer not to use the menu-plugin but rather to have launchers for my most used programs and use appfinder when I need one of the other apps.
|
As for launcher or even a XFCE/Gnome like menu I would suggest using fbpanel:
http://box-look.org/content/show.php?content=68023
http://fbpanel.sourceforge.net
It is a lot lighter/faster while having all needed functionality without any dependencies attached.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by souneedalink
I assume that kills all forms of session/settings management though? I am not sure most users would find that acceptable.
|
Dunno, I did not checked that, but it disables desktop icons for sure, anyway, nobody forces them to use it this way.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by souneedalink
So you feel that would be a lot lighter than metacity and a lite panel, assuming this is still considered to be gnome?
|
You will have to check that, I did not tried to lauch a minimal Gnome desktop iwthmetacity and gnome panel only.
One of the lightests would be pekwm/openbox + fbpanel,
|
|
|
|
01-06-2008, 12:17 AM
|
#25
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: London, ON, Canada
Distribution: Arch, Ubuntu, Slackware, OpenBSD, FreeBSD
Posts: 1,853
Rep:
|
Why all this bloody dropping of "Fluxbox - w00t!" ?!?!?!?! Fluxbox is a window manager! Nothing else! Why on Earth are you bringing Fluxbox into Desktop Environment discussions!?!?!?! *sheesh*
Either way...
Gnome gets my vote. Every now and then, I install KDE, but something ALWAYS happens, and I go back to Gnome - *contented sigh*. I just wish I had the time and patience to change the file manager from Nautilus to Rox-filer or Thunar.
|
|
|
|
01-06-2008, 07:56 AM
|
#26
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2008
Posts: 39
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vermaden
|
tried that, and fspanel, pyanel, perlpanel....my fav panel is still xfce4 cause I like the iconbox
Quote:
Originally Posted by vermaden
Dunno, I did not checked that, but it disables desktop icons for sure, anyway, nobody forces them to use it this way.
You will have to check that, I did not tried to lauch a minimal Gnome desktop iwthmetacity and gnome panel only.
|
I will have to try and see how slim I can make gnome. I actually disable the desktop in gnome as well. The question is - if you dont install anything but metacity and gnome-session is it still gnome or something else?
I just think people should realize that it is often the apps people choose that make a DE heavy and you can lighten up all of them from the default.
|
|
|
|
01-06-2008, 12:01 PM
|
#27
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Souther California
Distribution: Ubuntu 8.04.1/Kubuntu Remix 8.04.1
Posts: 8
Rep:
|
I was a KDE user back in 2000 and 2001 at school, and one day my account got messed up and was forced to start using GNOME. After that I have been 100% GNOME fan, I have tried newer KDE, and Xfce but I always come back to GNOME. Although I am looking forward to KDE 4, and the latest Xfce is pretty cool. 
|
|
|
|
01-06-2008, 06:30 PM
|
#28
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Seba Beach Alberta Canada
Distribution: Fedora 16
Posts: 251
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mega Man X
I had to vote for KDE this year. Gnome is getting slower and buggier every year. I am not sure what is going on with the developers. KDE4 looks very promissing as well.
|
I dont know what your are talking about there. Ah well...
KDE is to flashy for my tastes, though the default setting of KDE on the Yoper Live CD is pretty good. On Gnome I use the good old Bluecurve theme, though I downloaded a custom window border. I can not understand why anyone would want fancy effects as anything more than a toy.
|
|
|
|
01-06-2008, 09:53 PM
|
#29
|
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 489
Rep:
|
i have to go with gnome, KDE is too much like windows for my liking, it may be customisable and have alot of great features, but it's far to big and cumbersome for alot of PC's
|
|
|
|
01-06-2008, 10:32 PM
|
#30
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2005
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 414
Rep:
|
While mainly a Gnome user, I find XFCE to be shaping up nicely. My vote goes to them.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:45 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|