LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2007. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends February 21st.

Notices

View Poll Results: Audio Media Player Application of the Year
Amarok 545 57.37%
XMMS 96 10.11%
XMMS2 24 2.53%
mpg123 6 0.63%
Rhythmbox 64 6.74%
juK 6 0.63%
Beep Media Player 9 0.95%
Audacious 80 8.42%
cmus 1 0.11%
Banshee 31 3.26%
Songbird 18 1.89%
Exaile 26 2.74%
MPD 44 4.63%
Voters: 950. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 01-04-2008, 07:56 AM   #16
marciobarbalho
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2007
Location: Brazil
Distribution: slackware 13
Posts: 151

Rep: Reputation: 30

Audacious rocks
 
Old 01-04-2008, 09:37 AM   #17
JLP
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Slovenia
Distribution: Mandriva Linux
Posts: 61

Rep: Reputation: 15
Easy one, Amarok, the best music player and manager currently available on any operating system.
 
Old 01-04-2008, 11:02 AM   #18
Matz
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Distribution: Kubuntu 9.04, Debian Etch
Posts: 178

Rep: Reputation: 31
Amarok all the way. "available on any operating system."? Is that true?
I thought that Amarok for windows is on the way but not yet released.
 
Old 01-04-2008, 01:11 PM   #19
anticapitalista
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Greece
Distribution: antiX using herbstluftwm, i3, wmii, fluxbox, icewm and jwm.
Posts: 291

Rep: Reputation: 67
Still using xmms. The sound quality beats all others.
Second choice mpd/ncmpc and thirdly audacious.
Can't stand amarok.
 
Old 01-04-2008, 01:15 PM   #20
sundancekid
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Distribution: Debian Etch
Posts: 37

Rep: Reputation: 15
Amarok gets my vote.
 
Old 01-04-2008, 05:12 PM   #21
mjjzf
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Valby, Denmark / Citizen of the Web
Distribution: Slackware 14.1
Posts: 879

Rep: Reputation: 38
Tied between Exaile and Audacious.
 
Old 01-04-2008, 07:07 PM   #22
dammad
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwpbike View Post
mplayer mplayer
Yes. Mplayer would get my vote
 
Old 01-05-2008, 02:45 AM   #23
Alien_Hominid
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Lithuania
Distribution: Hybrid
Posts: 2,247

Rep: Reputation: 53
of course, xmms
 
Old 01-05-2008, 09:46 AM   #24
ciotog
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware current
Posts: 727
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matz View Post
Amarok all the way. "available on any operating system."? Is that true?
I thought that Amarok for windows is on the way but not yet released.
I'm pretty sure JLP meant that Amarok is best compared to all other music players and managers

Personally I just upgraded to the newest version of Gnome, and have to say that Rhythmbox 0.11.3 is quite amazing, with built in visualisation (that can work on the root window), automatic cover art and lyrics downloads, etal. The only thing I don't like about is the way the "stop" concept seems to be missing - I fail to see how this makes it easier to understand (which I presume to be the reason for its absence).
 
Old 01-06-2008, 12:32 AM   #25
indienick
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: London, ON, Canada
Distribution: Arch, Ubuntu, Slackware, OpenBSD, FreeBSD
Posts: 1,853

Rep: Reputation: 65
Amarok always loses my playlists, but it's quite nice.

However, my vote goes to Rhythmbox - it's clean and wonderfully simple.
 
Old 01-06-2008, 04:19 AM   #26
verdeboy2k
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: /dev/random
Distribution: Gentoo amd64, CrunchBang amd64
Posts: 350

Rep: Reputation: 32
amaroK -- the EMACS of media players!
 
Old 01-06-2008, 10:40 PM   #27
angryfirelord
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Posts: 498

Rep: Reputation: 59
Definitely amaroK for this one, although if I desire something more lightweight, I'll use Audacious.
 
Old 01-07-2008, 01:24 PM   #28
Tinkster
Moderator
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: in a fallen world
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 22,986
Blog Entries: 11

Rep: Reputation: 880Reputation: 880Reputation: 880Reputation: 880Reputation: 880Reputation: 880Reputation: 880
Good ol' proven and small xmms :}
 
Old 01-07-2008, 05:10 PM   #29
theriddle
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 172

Rep: Reputation: 30
Amarok does anything I ever need to do to any of my multimedia.



If I ever need something smaller, I use Xine-UI (same backend).
 
Old 01-07-2008, 07:16 PM   #30
Mega Man X
Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: ~
Distribution: Ubuntu, FreeBSD, Solaris, DSL
Posts: 5,339

Rep: Reputation: 63
amaroK gets my vote this year. Rhythmbox is not bad though.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Video Media Player Application of the Year jeremy 2006 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 112 08-26-2007 09:24 PM
Audio Media Player Application of the Year jeremy 2006 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 143 08-01-2007 06:51 AM
Audio Multimedia Application of the Year jeremy 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 103 03-05-2006 02:14 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration