2006 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2006 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2006. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends February 18th.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Distribution: At home: Kubuntu, Slackware, *BSD, Solaris. At work: Red Hat, CentOS, Debian, Fedora, Irix, HPUX
Posts: 3,341
Thanked: 8
Definitely bash for me, but I have a few friends who are tcsh devotees. I've wanted to sit down seriously with fish or zsh as they both look really cool, but I just have never been motivated to do so.
I know bash will take it, but I had to vote for tcsh. As for the conception that bash is universal... it's one of my biggest pet peeves. It's universal in Linux, true... but not universally.
Voted for bash, even though the fact bash is probably the most popular default shell doesn't mean it's the best. But bash is the best for me. At least for now. Lets see again in 1 year when I have more experience with other shell types
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.