2006 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2006 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2006. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends February 18th.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Definately Enlightenment DR17. It is fast, themeable, and eye-candish (is that a word?). Just pure ownage.
+100
On my 700MHz/256MB/ATI rage, the whole system (Arch linux with e17, 4 different & nice looking virtual desktops) has a 20 MB memory footprint, beeing the most elegant and tweakable wm I can think of.
Also use it on a daily basis on my amd 3200/1024MB/GeForce 6200.
This was just my 2 cents for those who did not try it recently, as there's been amazing work/improvment on Enlightenment DR17
First it was icewm. But I grew to dislike her looks.
Then it was wmii. But I raged every time I ran gimp.
And then it was fluxbox. But I... well... I'm still using fluxbox.
First it was icewm. But I grew to dislike her looks.
Then it was wmii. But I raged every time I ran gimp.
And then it was fluxbox. But I... well... I'm still using fluxbox.
Oh well, my vote goes to fluxbox!
I used Flux for a while before switching to OpenBox, wh/I really liked and used for a good year or so. Now I've got lots faster machine and using Xfce. But otherwise probably still be on OpenBox. Might want to give it a gander. It's way light and quite nimble.
I voted fluxbox. Just simple, slick and stays out of your way. However, after reading this thread, I looked into and installed fvwm-crystal. Wow! Upon installing I was really impressed by the default functionality they've set up on top of fvwm. I'm going to have to put it through its paces. Looks very cool though.
Well, I just checked out enlightenment for the first time (thanks to the SlackE17 project). All I can say is, I've found my new desktop! Simply incredible. Don't know why I haven't tried it before. Totally different experience than anything out there.
Well, I just checked out enlightenment for the first time (thanks to the SlackE17 project). All I can say is, I've found my new desktop! Simply incredible. Don't know why I haven't tried it before. Totally different experience than anything out there.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.