LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > 2006 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2006 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2006 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2006. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends February 18th.

Notices

View Poll Results: Text Editor of the Year
vi/vim 640 38.46%
emacs/xemacs 114 6.85%
Kate 277 16.65%
jEdit 24 1.44%
nano 160 9.62%
pico 31 1.86%
gedit 190 11.42%
Nedit 23 1.38%
joe 17 1.02%
Scite 21 1.26%
Midnight Commander Editor 43 2.58%
KWrite 124 7.45%
Voters: 1664. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 01-06-2007, 06:14 PM   #76
jerril
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 114

Rep: Reputation: 15

I use Vim almost all of the time. I use Gedit and Nano occasionally. I tried emacs when I first started with Linux, I thought it would be the GNU thing to do. I just never got used to it. I wanted to learn both emacs and vi. I ended up just sticking with vim; and using any other editor my current system defaults to (I can change it, but I like to learn the way my distro does things (and learn editors actually)).

I'd like to try learning emacs again, but every time I get adventuresome I try to peel another layer off of vim. I don't think I'll ever reach the core.

jer
 
Old 01-07-2007, 11:10 PM   #77
Cpoc
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Distribution: Switched to Debian Lenny
Posts: 69

Rep: Reputation: 15
Vim/Gvim for me that's all I use. It's not to difficult to learn and very powerfull.
 
Old 01-08-2007, 11:07 AM   #78
dumais
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2007
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 0
Oh, vim I think.
 
Old 01-09-2007, 08:02 PM   #79
pianoplayer
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: US Pacific NW
Distribution: BLAG
Posts: 6

Rep: Reputation: 0
Emacs

It does so much more than edit text. To an emacs user, it doesn't matter what one's desktop environment is.
 
Old 01-09-2007, 09:22 PM   #80
shevegen
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: Slackware / Debian
Posts: 89

Rep: Reputation: 15
I prefer bluefish but its not in the poll
 
Old 01-10-2007, 07:33 AM   #81
jerril
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 114

Rep: Reputation: 15
See Here:

http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...d.php?t=514964


jer
 
Old 01-10-2007, 02:39 PM   #82
Matz
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Distribution: Kubuntu 9.04, Debian Etch
Posts: 178

Rep: Reputation: 31
I use xemacs for coding and vi for console.

(x)emacs is highly customizable and you can find some .el files for specific languages (providing proper highlighting and shortkeys) on the web.

vi is really handy for editing config files.

As I can vote only one entry I go for emacs
 
Old 01-11-2007, 10:43 AM   #83
stress_junkie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.04 and CentOS 5.5
Posts: 3,873

Rep: Reputation: 331Reputation: 331Reputation: 331Reputation: 331
vi/vim

Just because you pretty much are required to know how to use vi if you want to support multiple platforms, and I have better things to do with my time than to learn how to use other text editors. vi is everywhere: Solaris, True64, Linux, *BSD, HP-UX, everywhere. So in the interest of efficiency vi is the only reasonable option.
 
Old 01-12-2007, 11:23 AM   #84
fcaraballo
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: WA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 230

Rep: Reputation: 31
Voted for pico since it doesn't look like Geany will be included this time around. I know Geany is a lightweight IDE but it works good as a text editor too.

MagicMan
 
Old 01-12-2007, 02:01 PM   #85
psisquare
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Germany
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 164

Rep: Reputation: 31
Another one for Vim. But I'd recommend gEdit to anyone with only occasional editing needs or who simply isn't prepared to take the comparatively steep learning curve.

I've tried Emacs before and came to the conclusion that it's actually not an editor, but could better be described as doing for Lisp what Squeak does for Smalltalk. For everyday editing, it's just too slow (Note that I am using a computer less than six years old), too complicated and simply gives me a headache when I try to customize it. Vim gives me all the extensibility I need in such a way that I can actually make use of it.

Well, probably boils down to personal preference again.
 
Old 01-12-2007, 06:34 PM   #86
Present
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Distribution: suse/slack/gentoo/lfs (not-in-that-order)
Posts: 281

Rep: Reputation: 30
well, here's my 2c worth...

vi/vim

confession: i started using vi/vim and unix equivalent 15+ years ago, and find it so easy to stick with what you know. can't really flame any of the others which are all probably excellent apps as well as i've only tried a couple and only once or twice...

here's to what's familiar :P

Last edited by Present; 01-12-2007 at 06:36 PM.
 
Old 01-15-2007, 03:51 AM   #87
archShade
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Delft NL
Distribution: Debian; Slackware; windows 7
Posts: 218

Rep: Reputation: 53
EMACS love the customability of it and all the lisp add ons

still when the jobs small vim is gd
 
Old 01-15-2007, 08:35 AM   #88
deftone`
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 40

Rep: Reputation: 15
I use vi (elvis) for editing config files.
Never really learned some of its commands though..
But I know the necessary.

Last edited by deftone`; 01-15-2007 at 08:55 AM.
 
Old 01-15-2007, 09:17 AM   #89
alienux
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Distribution: Slackware 12, Fedora Core, PCLinuxOS
Posts: 194

Rep: Reputation: 30
vi is pretty much all I use.
 
Old 01-16-2007, 01:48 AM   #90
Zelator
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne Australia
Distribution: Netrunner
Posts: 68

Rep: Reputation: 15
For my purposes, Kate. But why is there still no wordcount? I obtained the code for an external tool wordcount from a helpful person on a forum, but surely philosophical disputations as to "what is a word?" should not stand in the way when editors of far less sophistication have wordscounts. Grumble grumble.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Text Editor of the Year jeremy 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 150 05-23-2009 09:40 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:51 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration