Web Development Editor of the Year - Page 4

Kropotkin · 02-21-2006, 07:11 PM

gedit, with HTML, CSS syntax highlighting. It is't even a choice

hoernerfranz · 02-22-2006, 01:54 AM

quanta - still the best w.reg. to php support - which else offers integrated php-debugger (gubed) ?

Khepri · 02-22-2006, 07:32 PM

I really want to say gvim...

I'll say NVU..making strides with Linspire(?) behind it now...it was drowning as Mozilla Composer...

berkes · 02-24-2006, 03:16 AM

or kate, for the quickies.

brockers · 02-28-2006, 10:16 AM

Bluefish is worthless as a project editor and NVU is just too buggy. Quanta would run this category over if it wasn't for its memory usage. Overall though Quanta wins out.

Bobby

Satissh Srinivasan · 02-28-2006, 06:38 PM

Nvu anyday, bluefish is good for coding, while IMHO emacs itself is a pretty good editor.

Jaqui · 03-01-2006, 07:24 PM

joe or pico almost always for me.
screem if I'm using a gui editor.

I won't install bluefish, it requires libsmbclient and I have no use for microsoft connectivity.
[ same reason I won't install gnome. ]

I always code for the site to validate with the xhtml 1.x STRICT DTD and the formatting validates with the css2 validator. [ both from W3C ]