LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2005. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends March 6th.

Notices

View Poll Results: Editor of the Year
vi/vim 588 37.96%
emacs/xemacs 134 8.65%
jEdit 28 1.81%
nano 150 9.68%
pico 49 3.16%
Kate 348 22.47%
gedit 122 7.88%
Nedit 32 2.07%
joe 30 1.94%
Scite 19 1.23%
Midnight Commander Editor 49 3.16%
Voters: 1549. You may not vote on this poll

Tags used in this thread
Popular LQ Tags

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-01-2006, 05:19 AM   #46
Artanicus
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Tampere, Finland
Distribution: Gentoo, Slackware
Posts: 818
Thanked: 0

[Log in to get rid of this advertisement]
But where is every programmers favourite, Jed? /: Guess I'll have to vote emacs then for the emacs mode I use in it.. d:
Artanicus is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 06:56 AM   #47
kesara
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Colombo, Sri Lanka
Distribution: Arch Linux & Gentoo Linux
Posts: 116
Thanked: 0
Nothing else like vim yet;-)
kesara is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 08:17 AM   #48
kafnir
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Distribution: Fedora and Ubuntu
Posts: 137
Thanked: 0
sorry xemacs! I find a new friend call joe, and I don't like vi
kafnir is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 08:53 AM   #49
SaintsOfTheDiamond
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Lexington, KY
Distribution: Arch and a little Slack
Posts: 139
Thanked: 0
I never really like vi for much more than editing a couple lines of a config file. I use pico in CMI and Kedit in GUI.
SaintsOfTheDiamond is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 09:05 AM   #50
JackieBrown
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Distribution: Debian-AMD64 Sid
Posts: 481
Thanked: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raftysworld
Kate definitely for GUI, Nano for console
same. Though nano gets points for heping me regain my GUI
JackieBrown is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 09:35 AM   #51
mlaich
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Missoula, MT
Distribution: RH 9, Xandros
Posts: 26
Thanked: 0
ed is the only editor

ed is the standard text editor... rest all is waste. even GNU says so ...
http://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/ed.msg.html

Last edited by mlaich; 02-01-2006 at 09:38 AM..
mlaich is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 11:06 AM   #52
teledyn
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Sauble Beach, Ontario, Canada
Distribution: Mandriva/Mandrake, RedHat, Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, Morphix, Knoppix, Peanut
Posts: 21
Thanked: 0
Thumbs up Keep your eyes on Emacs ...

Yeah, I know, like the very first post says, this one is always fun ...

But I'm serious. Emacs. Honest. Ok, maybe not for 2005 because it's only in the CVS so far, but there's a change a-brewing in that code that's poised to change the Emacs game forever:

Gtk-Emacs

I know, you've heard that before and yes, the old gtk-emacs was about as exciting as the many Gtk-mozilla-isms, but let me tell you, I tuned in to the CVS and started playing with the New And Improved Gtk-support in the core FSF GNU-Emacs, and it's fab gear.

Honest.

Really. No, stop laughing, I'm serious. Really. It really is. No kidding. Get up off the floor, you look silly giggling like that. Really honest and truly, Gtk-Emacs is the first real advance in the state of the integrated information processing desktop in 22 years.

Goddammit, stop laughing!

Thank you. Anyway, for those of us who like this sort of thing, mark my words, this is exactly the sort of thing we like. Gtk-enabled Emacs coupled with XFCE-4 have changed my life, saved my marriage, cleared up my psoriasis and cured my hay-fever.

Your mileage may vary.
teledyn is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 11:14 AM   #53
teledyn
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Sauble Beach, Ontario, Canada
Distribution: Mandriva/Mandrake, RedHat, Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, Morphix, Knoppix, Peanut
Posts: 21
Thanked: 0
Is Pico an Endangered Species?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SaintsOfTheDiamond
I never really like vi for much more than editing a couple lines of a config file. I use pico in CMI and Kedit in GUI.
I have a colleagues who totally agrees with you, only we're having more and more trouble finding binary Pico packages; it's been tucked in with PINE and it seems distros like Redhat are dropping PINE from their bundles.

It's a shame, really. Damn fine little editor, easy on the eyes, easy to get non-technical people up to speed, and a breeze for anyone old enough to remember WordStar ...
teledyn is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 01:06 PM   #54
logicalfuzz
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Distribution: Slackware 12.0
Posts: 222
Thanked: 0
Vim for CLI.
But where's Beaver? Its ultra light weight. i like that feature of tabs in that editor. Also it highlights my C codes (and a few other langs). And finally i can install it on my LFS system... unlike Gedit which requires the GNOME libs and many more stuff relating to GNOME.
logicalfuzz is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 01:26 PM   #55
Emmanuel_uk
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Distribution: Mandriva 2007 mostly, vector 5.1, tried many.Suse gone from HD because bad Novell/Zinblows agreement
Posts: 1,596
Thanked: 0
Can we please have kwrite in the list, this is just one more
Kind of like it...
Emmanuel_uk is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 02:54 PM   #56
KimVette
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Bawstun area
Distribution: Suse (10.2, 10.3), CentOS, and Ubuntu
Posts: 1,796
Thanked: 0
for console editors I *heart* pico, with my second choice being vi.
KimVette is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 03:06 PM   #57
diilbert
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: North of the Border
Distribution: Gentoo & Debian
Posts: 149
Thanked: 0
My fav cli editor hands down is nano. No substitutes.
diilbert is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 03:46 PM   #58
PcManiac
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Lynden, WA
Distribution: Fedora Core 4 and Fedora Core 4 64bit
Posts: 17
Thanked: 0
VI it is quick and easy!
PcManiac is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 05:09 PM   #59
tizzef
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Nice, France
Distribution: Ubuntu,RHES, Mandriva, RHAS, AIX 4.3.3, 5.2 & 5.3, Debian,Solaris8/10
Posts: 74
Thanked: 3
vi/xvi/vim for ever
tizzef is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 05:43 PM   #60
cincindie
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Zinzinnati, OH
Distribution: RH, FC 1-6, F 7-10, Debian, LinuxPPC, Knoppix, Ubuntu, Yellow Dog
Posts: 157
Thanked: 0
I prefer vi, closely followed by pico.
cincindie is offline     Reply With Quote

Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which light text editor can copy text from file and paste in browser? davidas Linux - Software 9 03-06-2006 12:28 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
RSS2  LQ Podcast
RSS2  LQ Radio
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration