LinuxQuestions.org
Go Job Hunting at the LQ Job Marketplace
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2005. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends March 6th.

Notices

View Poll Results: Window Manager of the Year
Window Maker 78 6.65%
Fluxbox 318 27.11%
Enlightenment 176 15.00%
KWin 212 18.07%
sawfish 9 0.77%
MetaCity 98 8.35%
IceWM 92 7.84%
Blackbox 36 3.07%
AfterStep 7 0.60%
Openbox 26 2.22%
fvwm2 33 2.81%
Ratpoison 6 0.51%
Ion 16 1.36%
xfwm4 66 5.63%
Voters: 1173. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 02-01-2006, 07:45 AM   #31
animehair
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: NJ
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 104

Rep: Reputation: 15

Fluxbox for sure, however i think E17 is going to be HOT! In a way E17 provides the features of Fluxbox but with the extra eyecandy (and more cumbersome configuration as of now). I look forward to a more mature stable E17.
 
Old 02-01-2006, 11:11 AM   #32
taupist
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Idaho
Distribution: Mandriva
Posts: 30
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 15
I've been fascinated with AfterStep ever since I found it in Mdk 6.0. I felt slighted when they decided not to include it anymore. That being said, I use KDE almost exclusively although I also like Enlightenment and am especially fond of the rendition of Fluxbox in Feather Linux. All these WM's give us a chance to think about how things might be done and I think any OS is dead without this kind of choice.
 
Old 02-01-2006, 01:44 PM   #33
Widgeteye
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 100

Rep: Reputation: 17
Gnome is a horrible monster
 
Old 02-01-2006, 02:00 PM   #34
KimVette
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Lee, NH
Distribution: OpenSUSE, CentOS, RHEL
Posts: 1,794

Rep: Reputation: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by Widgeteye
Gnome is a horrible monster
Then it lives up to its namesake!

I gave gnome another chance the other day - I just could not get past the Windows-like operation, especially Nautilus. The limitations I run into with Nautilus just drive me nuts. It feels almost exactly like Windows Explorer.
 
Old 02-01-2006, 07:33 PM   #35
kassle
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Distribution: Linux From Scratch falling in love with Slackware
Posts: 44

Rep: Reputation: 15
ho ho ho ... as a lite linux users
blackbox is number uno, and KDE in the
last finger i have (sorry for KDE users)

bwa ha ha ha
 
Old 02-02-2006, 10:04 AM   #36
n3wb13
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: BG
Distribution: Slackware 10.1 (At Home), FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE (At Work) Both with fluxbox
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
fluxbox is my WM guru
 
Old 02-02-2006, 10:13 AM   #37
oneandoneis2
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: London, England
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 1,460

Rep: Reputation: 46
Sad, how everybody's got it wrong (Other than Ozar) - FVWM2 is by far the best
 
Old 02-02-2006, 12:45 PM   #38
Guimauve2
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Distribution: Debian sarge and LFS (Linux From Scratch)
Posts: 14

Rep: Reputation: 0
I use KDE, so -> kwin
 
Old 02-02-2006, 02:52 PM   #39
peter_89
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Distribution: Microsoft Windows XP Professional SP2; Slackware Linux 10.2
Posts: 215

Rep: Reputation: 30
OpenBox. It never sacrafices good looks for performance and yet remains the fastest replacement for MetaCity that I can find.
 
Old 02-02-2006, 06:43 PM   #40
lydgate
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: Fullerton, CA
Distribution: Arch 0.7.1 (laptop) / Slack 10.2 (desktop)
Posts: 41

Rep: Reputation: 15
I ran OpenBox once and got immediately addicted, it's super fast. With Xorg 7 + xcompmgr (finally got DRI on my stupid laptop ATI card), rox pinboard, fbpanel, it's seriously beautiful and amazingly fast. Configurable too.

I dunno why everyone's so crazy about fluxbox. I don't know if I just need to configure it a lot but every time I've tried it out it just sort of turns me off. Same with e16 and blackbox, I mean admittedly I haven't tried configuring them beyond the basics, but they're never really what I want. I'm always slightly bothered by what I'm missing, and I'm never sure if they really just aren't for me, or if I'm somehow doing something wrong. Can anyone who has experience with OpenBox point out why they choose Flux, Blackbox, or e16 over it?

The only other two I have even mildly been able to stand are waimea and e17. E17 is cool looking and fun to use, but I couldn't configure it for the life of me though.

I can't remember if I tried fvwm2 or not, and definitely not wmii or whatever.
 
Old 02-03-2006, 03:12 AM   #41
[MDK]NooB
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Venezia [IT]
Distribution: Slackware 11
Posts: 12

Rep: Reputation: 0
flux for my slack box
 
Old 02-03-2006, 02:18 PM   #42
esje
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Holland
Distribution: Debian Etch, Gentoo 2005.1/SUSE 10
Posts: 52

Rep: Reputation: 15
After numerous attempts to try and get the *ugh!* windowlist button and shortcut out of the way without also losing the multiple desktops and several other configurations I had, I left IceWM and started using fluxbox. I see now that I'm so original in that.. I need something new [=-)

No kidding, fluxbox here, if I'm not trying to do impossible things to DEs
 
Old 02-03-2006, 02:24 PM   #43
anti.corp
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Copenhagen
Distribution: Debian E, Vectorlinux 5.1std, Arch, Gentoo 2006.0
Posts: 576

Rep: Reputation: 30
Openbox and Fluxbox as my second. Light and highly configurable
 
Old 02-04-2006, 08:57 AM   #44
segin
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Gibsonton, FL
Distribution: Gentoo, Slackware
Posts: 24

Rep: Reputation: 15
KDE. I even use it on my NetBSD box, although I prefer Fluxbox as my true desktop.
 
Old 02-05-2006, 10:11 AM   #45
burntfuse
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Laurel, MD, USA
Distribution: Slackware 10.1, FC5
Posts: 164

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by peter_89
OpenBox. It never sacrafices good looks for performance and yet remains the fastest replacement for MetaCity that I can find.
Exactly why I voted for it - it's the best of both worlds.
 
  


Reply

Tags
members choice awards


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration