LinuxQuestions.org
View the Most Wanted LQ Wiki articles.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2005. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends March 6th.

Notices

View Poll Results: Web Development Editor of the Year
Quanta 354 44.31%
Bluefish 172 21.53%
Ginf 2 0.25%
Screem 23 2.88%
Nvu 199 24.91%
Mozilla Composer 49 6.13%
Voters: 799. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 02-21-2006, 06:11 PM   #46
Kropotkin
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: /usr/home
Distribution: Fedora, Mint, FreeBSD, Android
Posts: 346

Rep: Reputation: 31

gedit, with HTML, CSS syntax highlighting. It is't even a choice
 
Old 02-22-2006, 12:54 AM   #47
hoernerfranz
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Germany, South West
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
quanta - still the best w.reg. to php support - which else offers integrated php-debugger (gubed) ?
 
Old 02-22-2006, 06:32 PM   #48
Khepri
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Florida
Distribution: DebianSarge;UbuntuDapper
Posts: 34
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 15
I really want to say gvim...

I'll say NVU..making strides with Linspire(?) behind it now...it was drowning as Mozilla Composer...
 
Old 02-24-2006, 02:16 AM   #49
berkes
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 17

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quanta+

or kate, for the quickies.
 
Old 02-28-2006, 09:16 AM   #50
brockers
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Posts: 30

Rep: Reputation: 15
Bluefish is worthless as a project editor and NVU is just too buggy. Quanta would run this category over if it wasn't for its memory usage. Overall though Quanta wins out.

Bobby
 
Old 02-28-2006, 05:38 PM   #51
Satissh Srinivasan
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Chennai , India
Distribution: LFS (Linux From Scratch)
Posts: 17

Rep: Reputation: 0
Nvu anyday, bluefish is good for coding, while IMHO emacs itself is a pretty good editor.
 
Old 03-01-2006, 06:24 PM   #52
Jaqui
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Distribution: LFS, SLak, Gentoo, Debian
Posts: 291

Rep: Reputation: 36
joe or pico almost always for me.
screem if I'm using a gui editor.

I won't install bluefish, it requires libsmbclient and I have no use for microsoft connectivity.
[ same reason I won't install gnome. ]

I always code for the site to validate with the xhtml 1.x STRICT DTD and the formatting validates with the css2 validator. [ both from W3C ]
 
  


Reply

Tags
members choice awards


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration