LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2005. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends March 6th.

Notices

View Poll Results: Web Development Editor of the Year
Quanta 354 44.31%
Bluefish 172 21.53%
Ginf 2 0.25%
Screem 23 2.88%
Nvu 199 24.91%
Mozilla Composer 49 6.13%
Voters: 799. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 01-28-2006, 03:11 PM   #1
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 10,176

Rep: Reputation: 2597Reputation: 2597Reputation: 2597Reputation: 2597Reputation: 2597Reputation: 2597Reputation: 2597Reputation: 2597Reputation: 2597Reputation: 2597Reputation: 2597
Web Development Editor of the Year


What is your web editor of choice?

--jeremy
 
Old 01-29-2006, 01:25 PM   #2
microsoft/linux
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Sebec, ME, USA
Distribution: Debian Etch, Windows XP Home, FreeBSD
Posts: 1,445
Blog Entries: 9

Rep: Reputation: 45
NVU! I prefer HTML coding, but even still, a dreamweaver clone
 
Old 01-29-2006, 02:27 PM   #3
reddazz
Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 73
Quanta gets my vote because of the CSS editor but Bluefish came a close second.
 
Old 01-29-2006, 08:20 PM   #4
Raftysworld
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 20

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quanta by a mile, Bluefish is alright. Nvu is horribly buggy and uses a slow XUL toolkit.
 
Old 01-29-2006, 09:12 PM   #5
vharishankar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,142
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 120Reputation: 120
Quanta is my editor of choice simply because of its convenient auto-completion of HTML code and PHP coding assistance and its advanced CSS editor.
 
Old 01-30-2006, 12:51 AM   #6
Alien_Hominid
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Lithuania
Distribution: Hybrid
Posts: 2,247

Rep: Reputation: 53
Bluefish, from their website
Quote:
Lightweight - Bluefish uses on startup 40%-45% of the memory that other editors such as Quanta and Screem use, and during a full session closer to 33% of what these other editors use.
 
Old 01-30-2006, 03:31 AM   #7
Ruben2
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Lelystad, NL
Distribution: Debian Etch
Posts: 123

Rep: Reputation: 15
Bluefish, I don't like WYSIWYG apps
 
Old 01-30-2006, 11:20 AM   #8
chess
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: 127.0.0.1
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD, FreeBSD
Posts: 728

Rep: Reputation: 168Reputation: 168
Bluefish for sure.
 
Old 01-30-2006, 12:43 PM   #9
anticapitalista
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Greece
Distribution: antiX using herbstluftwm, i3, wmii, fluxbox, icewm and jwm.
Posts: 287

Rep: Reputation: 62
Bluefish

for the reasons Alien_Hominid point out.
 
Old 01-30-2006, 01:45 PM   #10
episode96
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 16

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quanta. KIO-Slaves and features others have already pointed out make it a winner for me.
 
Old 01-30-2006, 01:59 PM   #11
mjjzf
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Valby, Denmark / Citizen of the Web
Distribution: Slackware 14.1
Posts: 879

Rep: Reputation: 38
While I use Bluefish and like it very much, I feel that NVU has evolved at an impressive rate in recent years, so it deserves to be the app of the year.
 
Old 01-30-2006, 03:02 PM   #12
Kensai
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Puerto Rico
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 176

Rep: Reputation: 30
I have to give it up to nvu development.
 
Old 01-30-2006, 03:59 PM   #13
ZephyrXero
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Hattiesburg, MS, USA
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 21

Rep: Reputation: 15
NVU may still need a lot of work, but a WYSIWYG editor is just so much more natural for such a visual medium as web design...
 
Old 01-30-2006, 07:02 PM   #14
ozar
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 365

Rep: Reputation: 72
still sticking with quanta
 
Old 01-30-2006, 11:51 PM   #15
KimVette
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Lee, NH
Distribution: OpenSUSE, CentOS, RHEL
Posts: 1,794

Rep: Reputation: 46
Quanta by far and away, although I have to say that Seamonkey produces some fairly clean HTML as far as WYSIWYG editors go.
 
  


Reply

Tags
members choice awards


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:54 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration