LinuxQuestions.org
Go Job Hunting at the LQ Job Marketplace
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2005. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends March 6th.

Notices

View Poll Results: Editor of the Year
vi/vim 588 37.96%
emacs/xemacs 134 8.65%
jEdit 28 1.81%
nano 150 9.68%
pico 49 3.16%
Kate 348 22.47%
gedit 122 7.88%
Nedit 32 2.07%
joe 30 1.94%
Scite 19 1.23%
Midnight Commander Editor 49 3.16%
Voters: 1549. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 02-16-2006, 09:03 AM   #106
Mizzou_Engineer
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Missouri
Distribution: Gentoo 2007.0 x86 & amd64
Posts: 25

Rep: Reputation: 15

Kate, as its highlighting makes writing C (or any type of) code much easier.
 
Old 02-16-2006, 09:42 AM   #107
seanj
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: BC Canada
Distribution: Ututo-E (not for long)
Posts: 20

Rep: Reputation: 0
SciTE

SciTE has served me very well across multiple OS's and to be honest I prefer its simple interface to vi or emacs.
 
Old 02-16-2006, 01:29 PM   #108
jsteegh
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware, SuSe, eeeXubuntu
Posts: 14

Rep: Reputation: 0
vi/vim for console and kate for gui
 
Old 02-16-2006, 05:45 PM   #109
Zelator
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne Australia
Distribution: Netrunner
Posts: 68

Rep: Reputation: 15
Kate wordcount and macro

Quote:
Originally Posted by KimVette
KATE is great (I voted for it) but find it's a downgrade from TextPad on Windows. Where are:

* Word/Character/etc. count?
* Macro record/playback?
Seconded - if Gedit can have a wordcount why not Kate? I found a couple of addons that should give a wordcount, but only one, an external tool, actually works for me, and I have to recreate it whenever Kate is updated.
And the lack of macro is absurd in a progging editor, I had to brush the dust off 98SE the other day to do a bulk edit with TextPad. If TextPad were ported to Linux I would be using it.
 
Old 02-17-2006, 02:09 AM   #110
Mega Man X
Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: ~
Distribution: Ubuntu, FreeBSD, Solaris, DSL
Posts: 5,339

Rep: Reputation: 63
TextPad works perfectly in Linux with vanilla wine. I've tried it myself a couple of times... Though, my vote goes for jEdit. A very good example of what Java applications can do. Very customizable and platform independent as well. I can use vi if I need to make quick edits in a config file, nothing more
 
Old 02-17-2006, 04:23 PM   #111
BodyDrop
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
nano for the win!!
 
Old 02-17-2006, 05:27 PM   #112
Col._Panic
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Distribution: Xubuntu Edgy AMD64/"Wintendo"
Posts: 19

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by foxy123
I would vote for mousepad, which is fast, light and has everything I need...
Another mousepad fan here. Xfce4 users can't go past it for it's simplicity and speed.
 
Old 02-18-2006, 02:21 AM   #113
DrEwMoNeY
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Vulcan
Distribution: *buntu - Slackware - Anything on USB
Posts: 254

Rep: Reputation: 30
Need to try more!

I have only ever used Kate. I guess I should download others and try them. Never thought there would be a debate over a text editor!
 
Old 02-18-2006, 06:16 PM   #114
Kazuo
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Vim or vim or vim or vim...
 
Old 02-18-2006, 07:58 PM   #115
KimVette
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Lee, NH
Distribution: OpenSUSE, CentOS, RHEL
Posts: 1,794

Rep: Reputation: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrEwMoNeY
Never thought there would be a debate over a text editor!
You must be new here!
 
Old 02-18-2006, 08:32 PM   #116
DrEwMoNeY
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Vulcan
Distribution: *buntu - Slackware - Anything on USB
Posts: 254

Rep: Reputation: 30
Actually, I've been here since the 70's!
 
Old 02-18-2006, 09:12 PM   #117
patisawsome
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 52

Rep: Reputation: 15
Thumbs up

Pico takes the cake. Easiest to use on the console. Much easier than Vi
 
Old 02-19-2006, 05:26 AM   #118
darthtux
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: 35.7480 N, 95.3690 W
Distribution: Debian, Gentoo, Red Hat, Solaris
Posts: 2,070

Rep: Reputation: 45
vim, vim, vim. It will always be vim!
 
Old 02-19-2006, 10:02 PM   #119
jhigz
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Northern California
Distribution: Debian GNU/Linux
Posts: 32

Rep: Reputation: 15
I like using nano best.
 
Old 02-20-2006, 01:46 AM   #120
atanas
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
Kate is soooo good... Almost perfect
 
  


Reply

Tags
members choice awards


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which light text editor can copy text from file and paste in browser? davidas Linux - Software 9 03-06-2006 11:28 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:45 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration