2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2005. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends March 6th.
Notices
Welcome to
LinuxQuestions.org , a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free.
Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please
contact us . If you need to reset your password,
click here .
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
View Poll Results: Editor of the Year
vi/vim
588
37.96%
emacs/xemacs
134
8.65%
jEdit
28
1.81%
nano
150
9.68%
pico
49
3.16%
Kate
348
22.47%
gedit
122
7.88%
Nedit
32
2.07%
joe
30
1.94%
Scite
19
1.23%
Midnight Commander Editor
49
3.16%
01-30-2006, 07:28 AM
#16
Member
Registered: Nov 2004
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 187
Rep:
I would vote for mousepad, which is fast, light and has everything I need...
01-30-2006, 10:15 AM
#17
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: New Delhi, India
Distribution: Fedora 7
Posts: 1,305
Rep:
I love the features of jed, but I have chosen gedit for now
01-30-2006, 10:16 AM
#18
LQ Addict
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,307
Rep:
Emacs for me
.
01-30-2006, 01:03 PM
#19
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2006
Posts: 3
Rep:
Had to vote vim (kvim/gvim) as I used it HEAVILY this past year. But I think I'll be switching to Kate shortly. (Just wish I could use Kate in windows too)
01-30-2006, 01:09 PM
#20
Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: (X)Ubuntu 10.04/10.10, Debian 5, CentOS 5
Posts: 900
Rep:
I originally started using Kate because I was looking for something similar to Textpad or Notepad++ under Linux. You might be interested in checking those out...
01-30-2006, 01:20 PM
#21
Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: WA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 230
Rep:
Leafpad for GUI, pico for CLI
01-30-2006, 01:25 PM
#22
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Lebanon
Distribution: RHEL 5/CentOS 5/Debian Lenny/(K)Ubuntu Is Dead/Mandriva 10.1
Posts: 656
Rep:
what about jed........I find it cool and easy to use.
01-30-2006, 01:27 PM
#23
Member
Registered: May 2005
Location: Greece
Distribution: antiX using fluxbox, icewm and wmii
Posts: 248
Rep:
Nedit for gui and nano for console.
01-30-2006, 01:44 PM
#24
Member
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: 127.0.0.1
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD, FreeBSD
Posts: 474
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagicMan
Leafpad for GUI...
Leafpad is a great little gui text editor. But, I voted for vi.
01-30-2006, 01:51 PM
#25
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Panama
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 1,013
Rep:
Nano, what else?
01-30-2006, 02:42 PM
#26
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2003
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 16
Rep:
Kate is great.
01-30-2006, 02:50 PM
#27
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: Debian/other
Posts: 2,104
Rep:
Nano (with vi/vim as a sub) in the console - overall "editing technology" and improvement throughout the year, Kate.
01-30-2006, 02:55 PM
#28
Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY / Citizen of the Web
Distribution: Slackware 13.1
Posts: 847
Rep:
Vim. I use it for editing, LaTeX, XHTML, CSS... the works.
01-30-2006, 02:57 PM
#29
Moderator
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: in a fallen world
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 22,116
I should have stuck with emacs :}
These days I find myself incapable of driving emacs or vim
because I use the others way of doing stuff in each
I really came to like some of vims features, but still prefer
emacs for coding (because there's nothing that comes anywhere
NEAR to ELSE for vi).
Cheers,
Tink
01-30-2006, 04:04 PM
#30
Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Puerto Rico
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 176
Rep:
Nano simple and user friendly.
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 PM .
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know .
Latest Threads
LQ News