2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2005. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends March 6th.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
The section "Similarities to bash" talks about that and some differences.
One difference they didn't mention there:
One starts with the first 2 letters of the alphabet and the other starts with the last letter of the alphabet.
Last edited by MensaWater; 02-16-2006 at 02:01 PM.
I don't use a shell often enough to be very particular. I thought it would be best to stick with the shell used in all GNU/Linux distributions.
Here are a few other reasons:
any Linux documentation would likely be written about bash
any documentation I write, I would want to reach the widest audience
chances are that a script on my system would be written in sh, a close relative of bash, I might have a better chance of understanding what the script is doing
using another shell would probably hurt my puny brain
I like a lot of features of both csh an the korn shell; but, in practice, I found that I rarely used anything but bash
While zsh is functionally better; all of my scripts are built for bash... its simply become a matter of usage over any other consideration (although the bashmod for zsh tab completion works pretty well now.)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.