2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2005. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends March 6th. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
|
View Poll Results: Mail Client of the Year
|
|
Thunderbird
|
  
|
730 |
51.74% |
|
Kmail
|
  
|
303 |
21.47% |
|
Evolution
|
  
|
158 |
11.20% |
|
Sylpheed
|
  
|
54 |
3.83% |
|
pine
|
  
|
33 |
2.34% |
|
mutt
|
  
|
54 |
3.83% |
|
Balsa
|
  
|
3 |
0.21% |
|
Opera M2
|
  
|
29 |
2.06% |
|
SquirrelMail
|
  
|
18 |
1.28% |
|
IMP
|
  
|
3 |
0.21% |
|
Mozilla Mail
|
  
|
26 |
1.84% |
 |
|
02-18-2006, 04:04 AM
|
#61
|
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2005
Distribution: Gentoo, Ubuntu
Posts: 39
Rep:
|
When I first installed Mandriva I used Kmail and found it easy and usable.
Now I'm in Gnome on Gentoo, so Kmail is not an option. I tried Evolution, but I never really needed all it's featers, so I switched to Sylpheed. Simple, fast, easy.
Last edited by Jessii; 02-25-2006 at 01:59 AM.
|
|
|
|
02-19-2006, 05:43 AM
|
#62
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: 35.7480° N, 95.3690° W
Distribution: Debian, Gentoo, Red Hat, Solaris
Posts: 2,070
Rep:
|
I use gmail. But I do like thunderbird and mutt.
|
|
|
|
02-19-2006, 02:19 PM
|
#63
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: France, UE
Distribution: Arch Linux, Mandriva x86_64, Knoppix (Kaella), Ubuntu, ...
Posts: 89
Rep:
|
Opera M2 takes care of my various POP accounts & over 3000 messages + newsgroups + occasionaly RSS (of which videos). If only it took some Chinese input from SCIM...
Having read some opinion here I'd like to give Sylpheed a try 
|
|
|
|
02-19-2006, 09:56 PM
|
#64
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Northern California
Distribution: Debian GNU/Linux
Posts: 32
Rep:
|
Normally Firefox + Gmail here. The only local mail client on my machines is Thunderbird.
|
|
|
|
02-21-2006, 02:29 PM
|
#65
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 1
Rep:
|
I would say Kmail/Kontact
|
|
|
|
02-21-2006, 02:51 PM
|
#66
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.04 and CentOS 5.5
Posts: 3,873
|
Kmail/Kontact for me too. I like Kmail largely because it uses the maildir format, where each email message is in its own file. Mail clients that use a container file (mbox format) make me crazy. Not only does the file get larger over time which HAS to slow down processing, but it is very difficult to restore a single email message from backup. If each email message is contained in its own file then restoring from backup is easy.
|
|
|
|
02-21-2006, 03:52 PM
|
#67
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 52
Rep:
|
Thunderbird is the champion of the world. Thunderbird is the Chuck Norris of mail clients. Easy to use yet full of features.
|
|
|
|
02-24-2006, 02:28 AM
|
#68
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 17
Rep:
|
Kmail
kmail intergrates wonderfull.
|
|
|
|
02-24-2006, 06:31 AM
|
#69
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 7
Rep:
|
I find the poll a bit frustrating, for in several categories, what I use is not listed. For example, for a mail client, I use emacs-rmail. It has some limitations, but also some advantages. It would be nice to at least have the option "other".
|
|
|
|
02-24-2006, 10:39 AM
|
#70
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Watching it snow in bush Alaska
Distribution: *ubuntu, Smoothwall, WinXP Pro
Posts: 126
Rep:
|
Thunderbird mainly, but I like Kmail too.
|
|
|
|
02-24-2006, 12:03 PM
|
#71
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2006
Distribution: Zenwalk
Posts: 13
Rep:
|
Kmail all the way!
kmail kills the kompetition  
|
|
|
|
02-27-2006, 02:04 AM
|
#72
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2005
Distribution: slackware, LFS
Posts: 204
Rep:
|
mutt has no bugs just fleas.
|
|
|
|
02-28-2006, 09:46 AM
|
#73
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Posts: 30
Rep:
|
Kmail and Thunderbird are really the only choices here (at least for a modern GUI desktop.) Thunderbird lacks the functionality and just feels slower. Enterprise integration is also important where I'm at and Kmail fits the bill much better than Evolution (slow and broken ass piece of crap!)
Bobby
|
|
|
|
02-28-2006, 05:40 PM
|
#74
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Chennai , India
Distribution: LFS (Linux From Scratch)
Posts: 17
Rep:
|
Mutt rocks, seriously rocks. If you go for GUI clients, i luv thunderbird.
|
|
|
|
03-01-2006, 01:57 AM
|
#75
|
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Dreams
Distribution: Gentoo (since 2004.3) (and Windows XP)
Posts: 362
Rep:
|
I have moved to KMail now because of its integration with KDE along with KNode, but I voted for Thunderbird. It is the most intuitive.
Personally, I am getting frsutrated by KMail because of its bogus overall presentation and utterly poor 'view' options. Similar is the case with KNode, though it crashes less than Kmail.
Is it only me who thinks KDE applications focus more on Eye-Candy than usability? So many useless options but not the basic ones? Except amaroK, konqueror and konsole, no KDE application addresses basic (standard) issues.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:22 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|