LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2005. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends March 6th.

Notices



View Poll Results: File Manager of the Year
Nautilus 217 15.93%
Konqueror 698 51.25%
Midnight Commander 159 11.67%
KFM 5 0.37%
Xplore 1 0.07%
Xfe 44 3.23%
ROX-Filer 78 5.73%
Krusader 97 7.12%
gentoo 21 1.54%
Worker 6 0.44%
EmelFM/EmelFM2 21 1.54%
Xandros File Manager 15 1.10%
Voters: 1362. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 01-30-2006, 01:15 PM   #16
jaboua
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 12

Rep: Reputation: 0

Konqueror.
 
Old 01-30-2006, 01:29 PM   #17
anticapitalista
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Greece
Distribution: antiX using herbstluftwm, i3, wmii, fluxbox, icewm and jwm.
Posts: 291

Rep: Reputation: 67
Easy one this.

Rox-filer just rox with fluxbox.
 
Old 01-30-2006, 01:59 PM   #18
macondo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,016

Rep: Reputation: 51
Xfe, hands down! Fast as lightning, weighs nothing, and it has a lot of options.
 
Old 01-30-2006, 02:34 PM   #19
Skyline
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: Debian/other
Posts: 2,104

Rep: Reputation: 45
Konqueror - comprehensive, snappy, user-friendly, solid and reliable.
 
Old 01-30-2006, 02:41 PM   #20
episode96
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 16

Rep: Reputation: 0
Konqueror is what I use, though Krusader is also very nice. KDE apps with IO-slaves are far ahead of the game in this kind of things.
 
Old 01-30-2006, 03:06 PM   #21
mjjzf
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Valby, Denmark / Citizen of the Web
Distribution: Slackware 14.1
Posts: 879

Rep: Reputation: 38
MC. A classic - justly.
 
Old 01-30-2006, 03:25 PM   #22
ingerul
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Romania
Distribution: gentoo
Posts: 34

Rep: Reputation: 15
I'm still using gnome-commander....
 
Old 01-30-2006, 03:47 PM   #23
Kensai
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Puerto Rico
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 177

Rep: Reputation: 30
Konqueror, simple clean and fast.
 
Old 01-30-2006, 07:05 PM   #24
kolme
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Spain
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 23

Rep: Reputation: 15
ROX beats them all easily. The fastest, and very configurable.
 
Old 01-30-2006, 07:26 PM   #25
Daengbo
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Korea
Distribution: Debian unstable
Posts: 17

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by TruongAn
I vote for nautilus.
I think konqueror is the most powerful, but I was sophisticated.
Most of the time I use nautilus

Have you ever seen an Asian guy here???
I am one of them.

The catholic started the crusade.
The mosul started the jihad.
The buddism have never started wars for their religion.
First of all, Truang An, you need to change this sig because it is inflammatory and this is not a religious forum in which to discuss your evangalism. Secondly, you need to visit http://www.berzinarchives.com/kalach...hala_long.html . Finally, you know that Buddhism doesn't have a central structure the way that The Church in Europe did during the time of the crusades, but it does have political leaders -- kings and emporers who are / were viewed as Buddha reborn. I'll make the case that when a man calling himself Buddha declares war on his neighbor, that's a Buddhist religious war.

Please change your sig. It's inappropriate.
 
Old 01-30-2006, 07:48 PM   #26
ozar
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 374

Rep: Reputation: 73
Voted rox-filer... I've been using it for about a year now and have grown quite fond of it.
 
Old 01-30-2006, 08:52 PM   #27
microsoft/linux
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Sebec, ME, USA
Distribution: Debian Etch, Windows XP Home, FreeBSD
Posts: 1,445
Blog Entries: 9

Rep: Reputation: 45
what about mkdir/rm/mv/cp/etc.? I prefer the command line for file management
 
Old 01-30-2006, 09:30 PM   #28
Ha1f
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: University of Maryland
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 268

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by microsoft/linux
what about mkdir/rm/mv/cp/etc.? I prefer the command line for file management
that was my first inclination, but since it wasnt there, and i only have mc, i voted for that
 
Old 01-30-2006, 09:53 PM   #29
misunderstruck
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Distribution: Gentoo; Fedora Core 3
Posts: 28

Rep: Reputation: 15
Sadly, it seems to be not actively developed anymore, but Evidence is my favorite.
 
Old 01-30-2006, 09:53 PM   #30
hmarksbr
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Distribution: Conectiva
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
Whats KFM ? This does not exist since KDE ?.?
 
  


Reply

Tags
members choice awards


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:08 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration