2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2005. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends March 6th.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: Desktop Environment of the Year
always torn between GNOME and KDE (fluxbox is nice as well)
not really fair to compare though as GNOME is good for basic, stable performance while KDE is all about the eye-candy
i voted KDE becuase i feel it is making strides in moving common folk away from M$
I have been a GNOME user for as long as I can remember using Linux. I've used KDE, but never felt at home in it, though they both have made STRIDES into bringing the Linux Desktop eXPerience to the average user.
KDE seems to be not quite organized as GNOME, as (IMO) it has a lot of its controls cluttering windows with options. I like GNOME approach best, where you have a basic set of configurations within the app (or control center) and you can extend it as far as the application would allow with the GConf Editor.
Is GNOME worth the emerging, compilling, and configuring? (I use gentoo).
I have considered trying out GNOME before, I'm considering it again.
As with pretty much all-tings-Linux, it is more a matter of taste than anything else. For me the answer to your question is absolutely install it!, and thankfully in Gentoo is quite easy to do, however, on a more realistic note, you may better be off by trying a LiveCD/DVD distro based on GNOME to give it a whirl and get a feel for it before you actually install it... In any case, you can always uninstall it if you don't like it, or simply stop booting the LiveCD.
Some say that the default GNOME look will appeal more to Mac users (dunno why, really, there's only a menu in an upper panel, really). So no matter your decision, you should try it. You may fin it lacks some "bang!" effect, but then again, it doesn't aim for it either
I have only tried KDE and Gnome. I really liked Gnome, back on fedora core 4. But Gnome seems to want to crash every few minutes on suse 10. Now being a Suse 10 user, ill have to vote for KDE. It does what I want it to, and can be themed to look alot more quality than it first is.
I have only tried KDE and Gnome. I really liked Gnome, back on fedora core 4. But Gnome seems to want to crash every few minutes on suse 10. Now being a Suse 10 user, ill have to vote for KDE. It does what I want it to, and can be themed to look alot more quality than it first is.
it happens in suse because its been optimised for kde while gnome has been neglected up until now. suse was always a dedicated kde distro. if you try a gnome centric distro such as fedora, you will find kde crashing every 10 minutes (its usually even more frequent than this) too.
Last edited by NoWindowsInMyHome; 02-07-2006 at 09:56 AM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.