2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
Notices
Welcome to
LinuxQuestions.org , a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free.
Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please
contact us . If you need to reset your password,
click here .
View Poll Results: File Manager of the Year
Midnight Commander
148 14.70%
KFM
112 11.12%
Nautilus
260 25.82%
Xplore
2 0.20%
Xfe
19 1.89%
ROX-Filer
63 6.26%
Krusader
67 6.65%
Konqueror
308 30.59%
gentoo
22 2.18%
Worker
6 0.60%
#1
root
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 7,141
Thanked: 164
File Manager of the Year
[
Log in to
get rid of this advertisement]
A new award this year.
#2
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: far enough
Distribution: Snow Leopard, FreeBSD, Linux distros.
Posts: 1,689
Thanked: 1
what about file managers like xfe for example
http://roland65.free.fr/xfe/
#3
root
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 7,141
Thanked: 164
Original Poster
Xfe has been added.
#4
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Slackware 13.0, -current
Posts: 3,887
Thanked: 27
Some more nominees.
#5
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian SID / KDE 3.5
Posts: 2,313
Thanked: 0
I pressume KFM is Konqueror File Manager?
#6
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: the Netherlands
Distribution: debian SID
Posts: 2,169
Thanked: 0
I liked Nautilus best but I don't use any now.
#7
Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Dagenham, Essex, Britain
Distribution: PCLinuxOS
Posts: 483
Thanked: 0
I tend to use Konqueror because it's there, but recently I am quite impressed with Krusader. Would have voted for that had it been there!
#8
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: Debian/other
Posts: 2,103
Thanked: 0
Konqueror.
#9
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: lost in the midwest...
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,085
Thanked: 0
rox!!!
#10
Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: California
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 172
Thanked: 0
Midnight Commander. I don't need all that flashy icons and gui stuff that you get with rox or nautilus. Plain & simple with Midnight Commander thats why I use it.
#11
Member
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: ~
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 145
Thanked: 0
What about Krusader?
Dual pane, ftp, archiving, bookmarks, root mode, multi rename, and more.
Only problem it's a KDE app
#12
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: arch, slackware 10.2
Posts: 2,020
Thanked: 0
Quote:
Originally posted by detpenguin rox!!!
+1
#13
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA
Distribution: Debian GNU/Linux
Posts: 9
Thanked: 0
Dired (M-x dired in Emacs)
#14
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: over there
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 191
Thanked: 0
Rox. *nod*
#15
Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 134
Thanked: 0
A combination of "cd" and "ls"
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46 AM .
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know .
