LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2004. This is your chance to be heard! Voting closes on February 3rd.

Notices

View Poll Results: Web Development Editor of the Year
Quanta 348 50.88%
Bluefish 165 24.12%
Ginf 0 0%
Screem 32 4.68%
Nvu 94 13.74%
Mozilla Composer 45 6.58%
Voters: 684. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Search this Thread
Old 01-13-2005, 11:00 AM   #46
insyte
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Distribution: Slackware Current
Posts: 307

Rep: Reputation: 30

If only I could vote for quanta and bluefish. I like them both.
 
Old 01-13-2005, 11:43 AM   #47
dclayton
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Puyallup, Washington, USA
Distribution: Mandrake 10.1
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quanta is very good

Quanta works very well for me most of the time. I am sure I don't know 10 % of it's capabilities but it does what I want quickly and does not get in my way like most "easy to use" editors do. Yeah vi or emacs work as well for a quick change.

Dan
 
Old 01-13-2005, 11:39 PM   #48
mrbond
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
if you haven't heard yet: blufish 1.0 is relased.

bluefish 1.0 is the best!

Last edited by mrbond; 01-14-2005 at 06:19 AM.
 
Old 01-14-2005, 10:02 AM   #49
jerm1701
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Distribution: Mandriva 2007
Posts: 94

Rep: Reputation: 15
Close call between Quanta and Nvu. I'll admitt that Nvu's Windows version was the reason I voted for Quanta. It's so buggy.

Jeremy
 
Old 01-14-2005, 12:46 PM   #50
zoomastr
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: FL
Distribution: Fedora Core 3
Posts: 6

Rep: Reputation: 0
I use emacs
 
Old 01-14-2005, 01:07 PM   #51
amantia
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Posts: 9

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
I cannot figure out how to connect to a server 'securely' using Quanta. I believe I will make a thread about that but I wanted to point it out here. Other than that, I voted for Quanta because it's a very useful program.
Use the sftp or fish protocol in the upload dialog.
 
Old 01-14-2005, 03:14 PM   #52
tomek77
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quanta+
 
Old 01-14-2005, 05:27 PM   #53
vectordrake
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: NB,Canada
Distribution: Something alpha or beta, binary or source...
Posts: 2,280
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 47
Quote:
Originally posted by jerm1701
Close call between Quanta and Nvu. I'll admitt that Nvu's Windows version was the reason I voted for Quanta. It's so buggy.

Jeremy
0.7 is out and is a lot better
 
Old 01-14-2005, 10:49 PM   #54
ilikejam
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Glasgow
Distribution: Fedora / Solaris
Posts: 3,109

Rep: Reputation: 96
Emacs. Of course.
 
Old 01-15-2005, 02:28 AM   #55
zatriz
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Seattle, Wa
Distribution: Fedora,Trustix,Debian
Posts: 290

Rep: Reputation: 30
nvu best one i've tried
 
Old 01-15-2005, 11:05 AM   #56
Spudley
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Berkshire, England.
Distribution: SuSE 10.0
Posts: 299

Rep: Reputation: 32
*votes for KEdit*

Last edited by Spudley; 01-16-2005 at 11:51 AM.
 
Old 01-16-2005, 11:33 AM   #57
henryg
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: London, England
Distribution: Slackware 10.2
Posts: 182

Rep: Reputation: 32
sorry but for me I aint kidding
the best HTML code editor is Kwrite

it has the widest range of code-highlighting (more than bluefish)
it has collapse-expand notes .. and other stuff

true it doesn't have say - an inbuilt ftp client
bluefish is cute but annoying
screem makes me do the same
quanta+ keeps losing windows
both these two are too visually complex
NVU is Mozilla Composer with pretty icons
2 years hardly any comparable progress -
ie compare how Firefox evolved Mozilla extremely fast.

ginf : I've never heard of it .. so i will check it out
 
Old 01-16-2005, 11:54 AM   #58
NamShub
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Distribution: Gentoo, Debian, Knoppix
Posts: 21

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quanta.

It is the only software (along with the fish:// kio_slave) I *really* miss when I'm stuck on windows at work.

I am really looking forward to seeing the next generation with integration into kdevelop. Hopefully this will mean we'll have visual Object representation and class member autocompletion :P

Oh and for all those old-school types saying vi... you CAN use the embedded VIM KPART into Kate (the quanta editing component) so it should make you feel at home
 
Old 01-17-2005, 05:17 PM   #59
Baryonic Being
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 139

Rep: Reputation: 15
Out of the options, I've only used Quanta, which I like very much. But I still just use Kate for HTML editing most of the time.
 
Old 01-17-2005, 06:49 PM   #60
brockers
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Posts: 30

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quanta!

Bobby
 
  


 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:43 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration