LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2004. This is your chance to be heard! Voting closes on February 3rd.

Notices

View Poll Results: Mail Client of the Year
Evolution 262 20.99%
Kmail 272 21.79%
Thunderbird 594 47.60%
Sylpheed 29 2.32%
pine 29 2.32%
mutt 28 2.24%
Balsa 1 0.08%
Opera M2 15 1.20%
SquirrelMail 17 1.36%
IMP 1 0.08%
Voters: 1248. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Search this Thread
Old 12-31-2004, 09:11 AM   #16
halo14
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Surprise, AZ
Distribution: Debian | CentOS | Arch
Posts: 1,103

Rep: Reputation: 45

This is a tough one.. I really like Evolution.. especially for corporate email.. connecting to exchange and whatnot.. I also like Thunderbird on both Windows and Linux.. I even converted my grandmother and grandfather to Thunderbird and they just love it.. Also, on slow computers, sylpheed has all the necessary features and none of the bloat... I have an old notebook that I've been toying around with.. (Pentium 200MMX, 32MB RAM, 3 GB HD) and with both VectorLinux 4.3 and DSL hd-install sylpheed runs pretty nicely...
 
Old 12-31-2004, 09:33 AM   #17
davecs
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Dagenham, Essex, Britain
Distribution: PCLinuxOS
Posts: 485

Rep: Reputation: 31
What is the best? Who knows, they probably all work, and can all run Spamassassin for all I know.

I voted KMail/Kontact, simply because it integrates nicely with KDE.
 
Old 12-31-2004, 02:57 PM   #18
xcon
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Ohio
Distribution: Slackware 9.1 (and some 9.0)
Posts: 181

Rep: Reputation: 30
I was on thunderbird for a few months and started seeing that it repeats some of Outlook's mistakes in order to appeal to Outlook users. Then I found out why KMail seemed broken all along, and fixed it, and am finally happy. Gee, do I wanna load QT and KDE libs or GTK2 and XUL? It's just as slow for me...
 
Old 12-31-2004, 08:34 PM   #19
bpt
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA
Distribution: Debian GNU/Linux
Posts: 9

Rep: Reputation: 0
Gnus!!!
 
Old 01-01-2005, 05:09 AM   #20
Lindlar
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Jiangsu, China
Distribution: Debian unstable
Posts: 10

Rep: Reputation: 0
I use evoluation.
Mutt is --------------too ..........hard!
 
Old 01-01-2005, 05:16 AM   #21
kesara
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Colombo, Sri Lanka
Distribution: Arch Linux, Gentoo Linux, Ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 116

Rep: Reputation: 15
Both Evolution & KMail are great.
I use the best & i.e. KMail
 
Old 01-01-2005, 08:47 AM   #22
bluesman2333
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Phoenix, Az.
Distribution: Xubuntu Edgy
Posts: 330

Rep: Reputation: 30
Kmail is what I use at the moment, but M2 really looks promising. Next year M2 should be smoking hot.
 
Old 01-01-2005, 03:27 PM   #23
JackieBrown
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Distribution: Debian-AMD64 Sid
Posts: 481

Rep: Reputation: 31
Thunderbird because I use linux and windows. Use a fat32 drive and I can access my mail in either sys
 
Old 01-01-2005, 04:01 PM   #24
mikedeatworld
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Farmington Michigan
Distribution: UBUNTU - Slackware - SuSE 9.1 - Knoppix - Fedora
Posts: 828

Rep: Reputation: 30
evolution....
 
Old 01-01-2005, 04:04 PM   #25
carmichaelbaby
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Posts: 14

Rep: Reputation: 0
evolution

evolution + hotwayd = more convenience than I deserve!

I also like "paste quotation" which wasn't in the earlier version
I used to use, but is there now.

I like the way it handles attachments, especially images.

There's lots more, but I need not write a novel.
 
Old 01-01-2005, 04:50 PM   #26
bobbens
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Barcelona
Distribution: Debian, FreeBSD, Gentoo
Posts: 586

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by JackieBrown
Thunderbird because I use linux and windows. Use a fat32 drive and I can access my mail in either sys
ditto :P
 
Old 01-01-2005, 06:52 PM   #27
JLP
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Slovenia
Distribution: Mandriva Linux
Posts: 61

Rep: Reputation: 15
Thunderbird
 
Old 01-02-2005, 12:33 AM   #28
fotoguy
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Brisbane Queensland Australia
Distribution: KirraMail Live Email Server
Posts: 1,279

Rep: Reputation: 61
Kmail for me, It's easy to use, has all the features I need.
 
Old 01-02-2005, 12:49 AM   #29
fcaraballo
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: WA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 230

Rep: Reputation: 31
Thunderbird

MagicMan
 
Old 01-02-2005, 01:01 AM   #30
xxx_anuj_xxx
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Bharat
Distribution: RedHat, Debian, FreeBSD, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 114

Rep: Reputation: 16
simply
1:- mutt 2nd:- evolution
 
  


 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how to configure mail client to send mail out on different pppd threads vkrishn1 Linux - Newbie 0 12-29-2004 10:54 AM
Exists a mail-client for Fedora, that can read local mail file without deleting? mxn Linux - Software 1 07-10-2004 12:53 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:48 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration