LinuxQuestions.org
Register a domain and help support LQ
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2004. This is your chance to be heard! Voting closes on February 3rd.

Notices

View Poll Results: File Manager of the Year
Midnight Commander 148 14.70%
KFM 112 11.12%
Nautilus 260 25.82%
Xplore 2 0.20%
Xfe 19 1.89%
ROX-Filer 63 6.26%
Krusader 67 6.65%
Konqueror 308 30.59%
gentoo 22 2.18%
Worker 6 0.60%
Voters: 1007. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Search this Thread
Old 01-01-2005, 04:59 AM   #16
Lindlar
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Jiangsu, China
Distribution: Debian unstable
Posts: 10

Rep: Reputation: 0

I am a very newbie. mc is hard to me.
 
Old 01-01-2005, 07:37 AM   #17
ratpoison
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Long Island, NY USA
Distribution: Fedora Core 3, Ubuntu Hoary
Posts: 53

Rep: Reputation: 15
Midnight Commander is very full featured (and quite similar to Norton commander used in other OS's). emelfm2 seems to me to be a more "guified" (is that even a word?) version of mc. It is also quite powerful. Gentoo (the file manager not the distro) is also quite useful.
 
Old 01-01-2005, 09:15 AM   #18
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 10,316

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612
ROX-Filer has been added.

--jeremy
 
Old 01-01-2005, 09:39 AM   #19
mysterio
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Springfield Ma.
Distribution: Mandrake 9.2,Knoppix 3.7,Slackware 10.0, FreeBSD. 5.3, OpenBSD 3.6, NetBSD 2.0, Debian
Posts: 275

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by uman
A combination of "cd" and "ls"
That's pretty much what I use, maybe a little grep and find and a few others thrown in.
 
Old 01-01-2005, 10:14 AM   #20
jfi
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: France
Distribution: Mandriva2007, Debian, OpenSuse, Slack10, FC6, PC-BSD, Solaris10
Posts: 65

Rep: Reputation: 15
Can't vote, I only use Krusader and Worker http://www.boomerangsworld.de/worker/
 
Old 01-01-2005, 10:41 AM   #21
Snowolf
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Triest (in the north-east of Italy, near Venice)
Distribution: ProMEPIS-2005.b02
Posts: 17

Rep: Reputation: 0
I am using Konqueror and it works... and this is the most important think...
 
Old 01-01-2005, 10:50 AM   #22
Napper
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: Ubuntu Warty
Posts: 56

Rep: Reputation: 15
Krusader for me, too...
 
Old 01-01-2005, 11:39 AM   #23
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 10,316

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612Reputation: 2612
Krusader has been added.

--jeremy
 
Old 01-01-2005, 06:25 PM   #24
carmichaelbaby
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Posts: 14

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
A combination of "cd" and "ls"

I hate to jump on the bandwagon, but thats
me to.

If you're like me and often create a ton of
similarly named files and/or directory structures at the same
time, you want stuff that only a good shell can offer (BASH) .

nautilus seemed OK for the windows switch-over, prior
to learning BASH.
 
Old 01-01-2005, 06:46 PM   #25
JLP
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Slovenia
Distribution: Mandriva Linux
Posts: 61

Rep: Reputation: 15
Krusader
 
Old 01-01-2005, 10:02 PM   #26
X Predator X
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: New Jersey, US
Distribution: Mandrake 10.1, SuSE 9.2, DSL
Posts: 30

Rep: Reputation: 15
which one is the one that comes in DSL? that gets my vote for now

that or "ls" "cd"
 
Old 01-02-2005, 12:08 AM   #27
slakmagik
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,113

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally posted by X Predator X
which one is the one that comes in DSL? that gets my vote for now
emelfm

Incidentally, anyone know where the source code for their version is? They seem to have modified it, but I can't find the code.
 
Old 01-02-2005, 12:17 AM   #28
fotoguy
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Brisbane Queensland Australia
Distribution: KirraMail Live Email Server
Posts: 1,276

Rep: Reputation: 61
A combination of konqueror and terminal screen, never used a file manager before so I really could vote for anything.
 
Old 01-02-2005, 01:03 AM   #29
fcaraballo
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: WA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 230

Rep: Reputation: 31
rox-filer

MagicMan
 
Old 01-02-2005, 02:20 AM   #30
NeeD_ResT
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Canada Québec
Distribution: Debian 3.0r2 i386/sparc mandrake 9.1/i586
Posts: 20

Rep: Reputation: 0
Hi,

It's a hard choice, i mostly use MC, but i like Konqueror (because of the fish command to transfert files between my servers).
 
  


 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Gentoo file manager] Install RPM from the file manager? Coume Linux - Software 2 12-10-2003 02:21 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:47 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration