LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards (http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2004-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-awards-62/)
-   -   Editor of the Year (http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2004-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-awards-62/editor-of-the-year-272122/)

jeremy 12-30-2004 08:49 PM

Editor of the Year
 
This one is always fun ;)

guzzi 12-30-2004 09:43 PM

vi rules
 
first two votes are in, and vi is still the king. Wahoo

smith847be 12-31-2004 01:40 AM

I'd actually have to go with Midnight Commander's built-in editor. All I ever use - seems more intuitive to me than the other console editors, and definitely more convenient since I use MC as my only file manager.

reddazz 12-31-2004 02:14 AM

Emacs rules! Ok, I voted for emacs, however, KATE is also very good if you are running X. I like the built in console as well.

J.W. 12-31-2004 02:48 AM

pico for editing files like lilo, fstab, and the like; Kate for editing PHP and HTML. If I had to choose one, I'd go with Kate. -- J.W.

masand 12-31-2004 03:42 AM

old is gold

vi/vim still rulez!

n0xvb 12-31-2004 03:46 AM

I have to agree with smith847be, I use the MC built-in editor as well (even from X term).

I'll also use jove.

IBall 12-31-2004 04:49 AM

vim is good, especially gvim (Since it has mouse support and looks better)

--Ian

druuna 12-31-2004 05:44 AM

vi(m), not new but still rocks.

Junior41180 12-31-2004 08:59 AM

I'm a pico or nano fan. :)

darkleaf 12-31-2004 09:15 AM

vi!

bobbens 12-31-2004 09:54 AM

I don't see ee (easy edit) up there. Well i use that. I find it alot easier and more comfortable to use then vi.

mjjzf 12-31-2004 10:06 AM

Gedit is nice for fast editing of webpage files. And it just looks the part With Gnome.

davecs 12-31-2004 10:20 AM

Kate for me, however there is a non-GPL editor called editpad which I like as well.

Adrohak 12-31-2004 11:37 AM

joe.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 AM.