2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2004. This is your chance to be heard! Voting closes on February 3rd.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
This category could be divided into "Best Distro for Modern Hardware" and "Best Distro for Older Hardware".
In the Modern Hardware category, I vote for Mepis. Hands down. I've tried every major distro at least once over the past 5 years and I've finally settled on Mepis.
In the Older Hardware catagory, it's Archlinux. Got it running on my old Toshiba Satellite laptop with 32 meg. ram. Not fancy or fast, but very functional and well thought out.
Last edited by peteathome; 01-01-2005 at 03:16 PM.
Ten Reasons for Trying SimplyMepis has turned into Ten Reasons for Staying with SimplyMepis. And Debian has to get my second vote (if I had one), because Mepis is built on it. By the way I also run Mandrake, Suse, and Fedora. And I've recently eliminated from my drives Slackware and Ubuntu. Mepis is simply the best.
I went from Mandrake to RH to Slack to Knoppix to Arch, and I keep on returning to Arch. It just works. There aren't any GUI tools, but the simple /etc files beat the the simplicity of Slackware by a lot. Oh, and it's by far the fastest I've tried LFS or Gentoo....but belum....for you all you Indonesian speakers out there. Are there any? hehe
I am using slackware and I am quite happy about it.
Slackware's installer is perfect for my PC. It's quite friendly for people who have to change/tweak the configurations. linuxpackages offer common packages so most of the time I don't have to compile. The packages dependence is usually easy to solve. Compile/makepkg is usually smooth, too. Slackware is very comfortable for me.
I used too many hours to hack/tweak many things but I still can't make it simple enough for friends. It's stable but not perfect. There are still some i18n issues that I can't solve. Slackware 10 has more fonts/i18n problems than old versions.
So, I won't vote this year. (I have no time to try others distros. Mepis, ubuntu, fedora are progressing and I know nothing about them. It wouldn't fair without comparison)
Fedora - because I'm a lazy bastard and just want
tons of good software right from the get go.
None of this "workstation install", "server install"
or whatnot. Nope. I want everything they packed
into those 3 CDs! I want the asian character support that
I'll never use, and more servers, clients, and programming
languages/environments than I'd be able to learn in a lifetime.
Honestly, between all command line and X programs,
it's like getting a new toy evey day. I still haven't come
close to trying everything I got.
Are there other distros that give you a huge mountain
of software like that from the initial install? I'd consider
giving any a try that meet this criteria.
I'm kind of tempted by the ease of package management
I hear about in debian (that'll probably the next distro I try), but
for the time being, rpm-ing and compiling have worked for me on the
rare occasion that what I wanted wasn't already there.
I used to use Mandrake and really loved it, didn't like the changes to support structure ( I go way back -- version 6).
I wanted something that everyone seems to make sure their product works with and the Redhat name always comes up (just read this thread). This points to something standardized and consistent or at least something people compare what they ae doing with.
So I jumped right in the middle of where everyone is looking: Fedora Core 3 on my personal systems and Redhat Enterprise 3 on my webservers..
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.