2003 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2003 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2003. This is your chance to be heard!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: Desktop Environment of the Year
Distribution: Mandrake 9.0 1st/9.1 2nd/Gentoo 1.4 now
Posts: 313
Rep:
Quote:
Originally posted by krussell hi
kde is the best window manager i have ever used, gnome is *pictorial* and nice to look at sometimes, but it cannot do a damn job, and most importantly reminds me of m$.
LOL! how can gnome remained you of M$ and KDE don't
Distribution: Mac OS 10.7 / CentOS 6(servers) / xubuntu 13.04
Posts: 1,186
Rep:
KDE does remind me some of M$, in fact its alot like M$.. yet here is thing, IMHO, KDE allows me to get used to Linux.. after spending hours and hours on a windows machine...
XFCE is not like KDE or Gnome....however you can run KDE and Gnome apps in XFCE. Matter of fact you can even bring up the KDE or Gnome panels (i.e. the "start" task bar at the bottom).
Picture this...you log into X windows and you're almost instantly in your session....then later on you want to run a KDE app but you can't remember the name for whatever reason...you run "Kicker" and it starts the KDE panel at the bottom....meanwhile you didn't have to wait to log in to X while KDE was initializing (the part where you stare at the icons blinking for like 2 minutes).
I'd say give it a try. You can always ditch it if you don't like it :-) I started with Gnome...then after several months I went to KDE. Then I tried ICEWM.....and one day I heard about XFCE. Haven't looked back :-)
Originally posted by Skyline KDE - slick, polished and "fully featured".. looking forward to 3.2..
I used to use fvwm on my earliest PC GNU-based systems, and even occasionally on my UNIX workstation. On UNIX, I most frequently used Motif, then CDE, so I was quite used to that kind of environment. When KDE came out, I used it for quite a while and was generally satisfied with it. For easy to use software, KDE is hard to beat. It is, however quite resource intensive, and it takes a relatively long time to start up when you login.
When I first discovered XFCE, it looked to me like a cut down version of CDE. I didn't like it much at first, but then it grew on me. By XFCE version 3.8.12, I was converted, and actively used XFCE 3.8.18. I now use XFCE 4.0.3 nearly every day.
KDE and XFCE are the desktop environments I use most often. For some reason, GNOME has never really grown on me. I have no big issue with it, it's simply personal familiarity and preference.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.