LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2003 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2003 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2003 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2003. This is your chance to be heard!

Notices


View Poll Results: Browser of the Year
Mozilla 348 26.67%
Mozilla Firebird 500 38.31%
Opera 154 11.80%
Konqueror 177 13.56%
Lynx 14 1.07%
Netscape 15 1.15%
Galeon 62 4.75%
Epiphany 35 2.68%
Voters: 1305. You may not vote on this poll

 
  Search this Thread
Old 12-11-2003, 11:03 AM   #106
roy_tan711
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Cyberjaya
Distribution: Slackware9.1 RH9.0 freeBSD4.7 HP-UX
Posts: 43

Rep: Reputation: 15

im using opera,mozilla and firebird. though opera quite fast, but i hate the advertisement in the icon bar :P and mozilla firebird still my favourite
 
Old 12-11-2003, 06:34 PM   #107
Scruff
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Stoughton, MA
Distribution: Gentoo x86_64 & PPC
Posts: 949

Rep: Reputation: 30
Firebird just got the #1 spot in Maximum PC's (Jan 2004 issue) 2nd annual Softy Awards- "The 10 most amazing, most indespensible apps and utilities of 2003"

And I quote:

"The best part is that Firebird hasn't even hit version 1.0 yet. Actually, thats the next-to-best part. The best part is that Firebird is Mozilla's direct challenge to Microsoft on the web front."

Wheeeee!
 
Old 12-12-2003, 04:51 PM   #108
techchiq
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Western NY State
Distribution: Pink Tie 9 (Red Hat 9 clone from CheapBytes.com)
Posts: 32

Rep: Reputation: 15
Actually, for me, it's a tie because I use Konqueror about as much as I do Mozilla. Konqueror renders some parts of web pages more accurately I think, and changes the color of the scrollbar according to the site's CSS definitions (if any). I haven't tried Mozilla Firebird so maybe that would do the same as Konqueror. I should look into it I guess. I also like the plugins available for Mozilla, like StumbleUpon, GoogleBar, Blog This, and the web site downloader. I like Konqueror's Web Archive format though, as it puts all the files (including images) into ONE .war (Web ARchive) file.

So really, I use both... But if I had to vote for just one, I think Mozilla because of the extras I can use in it as well.
 
Old 12-13-2003, 01:13 PM   #109
spurgeonb
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2001
Distribution: FC4 / Knoppix / Debian
Posts: 22

Rep: Reputation: 15
I had tried most of these and found optimised (read without frills) Opera to be simply blazing ahead and leaving all other browsers way way behind. Try it out... ;-)
 
Old 12-15-2003, 01:16 AM   #110
vanquisher
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 126

Rep: Reputation: 15
Firebird rocks the set. Lean, clean and fast. Displays everything perfectly(something I hated in Opera). Just open google.com in both firebird and in opera, you can see the difference. Firebird for ever!!!
 
Old 12-15-2003, 01:35 AM   #111
arunshivanandan
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Kerala,India
Distribution: RedHat,Mandrake,Debian
Posts: 643

Rep: Reputation: 30
firebird rules.if there was a second option,then opera wins hands down.opera looks&skins are really better.also,upgrades are coming almost every month.the problems are,
1.the ad on top right side for the free versions.
2.Display is not as good as Firebird.
The firebird display is not as good as IE one(Okay,only for the websites designed for 'IE only').chechout timesofindia.com in firebird and IE and you will feel the difference.
Also,the minimum size for a gzipped firebird is 14mb or so.opera it is just 5mb,for the static version.
Both have block popup option.(move over IE)
Also,for opera,flash 6 comes as default,unlike in firebird.Also,somethimes,the 'download flash' or 'download java' messages in firebird does not work in the first(or 2nd or 3nd) click itself.
 
Old 12-16-2003, 01:26 AM   #112
HappyDude
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 140

Rep: Reputation: 15
I'd love to go ahead and vote Firebird, but damn, I can't. The font sizes on are just to screwed up. So I have to cast a vote for Konqueror.
 
Old 12-16-2003, 04:10 AM   #113
mariuz
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: gentoo
Posts: 69

Rep: Reputation: 19
I wold vote Mozilla *bird but already voted the lynx
Use both of them daily ...
 
Old 12-25-2003, 03:31 AM   #114
THEHERO
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 165

Rep: Reputation: 30
Mozilla Firebird is awesome. It has everything I like about Mozilla but isn't slow.
 
Old 12-28-2003, 09:40 AM   #115
tokkee
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Debian, OpenBSD
Posts: 46

Rep: Reputation: 15
i see links/elinks missing in here! i don't think, it's the same as lynx, since it really supports things like frames and tables...

anyway, firebird isn't bad either...

cheers
 
Old 12-28-2003, 10:36 AM   #116
conceptx
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Slackware 10, Windows XP Pro
Posts: 33

Rep: Reputation: 15
What is the differnce between Mozilla and Mozilla Fireball, haven't used M-Fireball and I am not in a rush to I am just curious. I use Mozilla on my slackware 9.1 and xp pro and rust me it kicks a..
ta
 
Old 12-28-2003, 03:08 PM   #117
slakmagik
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,113

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Have you read the rest of this thread, searched LQ for Mozilla/Firebird threads, gone to the Mozilla site? Basically, Mozilla is a web application suite and development platform and Firebird is a browser only - no email or anything else. Basically, just a piece of the mozilla code chopped out, rewritten to try to smooth off the rough edges, and given a more IE-like GUI look. For more details, check those sources I mentioned.

But yeah, mozilla kicks.
 
Old 01-02-2004, 02:02 AM   #118
sxa
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Distribution: Mac OS 10.7 / CentOS 6(servers) / xubuntu 13.04
Posts: 1,186

Rep: Reputation: 49
I voted Mozilla because that is what I use.. yet I have been really thinking about buying Opera..
 
Old 01-03-2004, 03:50 AM   #119
krussell
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: dhaka
Distribution: Slackware 11 (fixed), MEPIS
Posts: 241

Rep: Reputation: 30
so many people are trying here and there...firebird, galeon, epiphany(did i spelled it right?)....., and there are others like opera, konqueror, BUT noone has the potential to beat MOZILLA
 
Old 01-04-2004, 12:26 AM   #120
sxa
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Distribution: Mac OS 10.7 / CentOS 6(servers) / xubuntu 13.04
Posts: 1,186

Rep: Reputation: 49
I will agree Mozilla beats Kongueror.. other then that I have not ried Firebird, Galeon, or epiphany (I spelled those like you did, I don't know if they are spelt right or not).. Nor Have a tried oprah, but Have heard so many good things about it..
 
  


 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
browser plugin for Konqueror web browser (linspire) Tracianddwayne Linux - Newbie 1 01-01-2005 03:15 PM
gaim browser / default browser question hildog Linux - Newbie 2 10-03-2003 10:17 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration