LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Other *NIX Forums > *BSD
User Name
Password
*BSD This forum is for the discussion of all BSD variants.
FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, etc.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 05-31-2012, 02:28 PM   #1
nixblog
Member
 
Registered: May 2012
Posts: 426

Rep: Reputation: 52
Question Why should you be using FreeBSD?


Just read this on Phoronix so I decided to post the link and get feedback,

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...tem&px=MTExMDg

Do you agree or disagree with the comments made?
 
Old 05-31-2012, 02:52 PM   #2
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Main: Gentoo Others: What fits the task
Posts: 15,576
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4036Reputation: 4036Reputation: 4036Reputation: 4036Reputation: 4036Reputation: 4036Reputation: 4036Reputation: 4036Reputation: 4036Reputation: 4036Reputation: 4036
They lump together all Linux distros. I really doubt that FreeBSD is more stable than distros like Slackware or RHEL. they also totally "forget" that driver support for Linux is magnitudes better.
 
Old 05-31-2012, 03:31 PM   #3
ruario
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Oslo, Norway
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,817

Rep: Reputation: 817Reputation: 817Reputation: 817Reputation: 817Reputation: 817Reputation: 817Reputation: 817
There are way too many, "we're not Linux" style responses for my liking.
 
Old 05-31-2012, 04:02 PM   #4
lykwydchykyn
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu
Posts: 135

Rep: Reputation: 36
Well I read the list, and I'm not using FreeBSD yet.

Wait a sec...


Nope, still not.

I'll get back with you if that changes.
 
Old 05-31-2012, 04:11 PM   #5
273
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 3,350

Rep: Reputation: 773Reputation: 773Reputation: 773Reputation: 773Reputation: 773Reputation: 773Reputation: 773
Which one's FreeBSD? Is it the one PCBSD is based on or is that NetBSD? Or am I thinking of OpenBSD being based on another one. Does DragonflyBSD have better hardware support than FreeBSD?
What happened to FreeSBIE? How long will MirOS BSD be supported for, is it better than DesktopBSD?
Is NeXT still BSD, is it the same as OSX? What on earth is OpenStep?
I can't understand what's going on with BSD it's far too fragmented!
 
Old 05-31-2012, 04:15 PM   #6
nixblog
Member
 
Registered: May 2012
Posts: 426

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by 273 View Post
I can't understand what's going on with BSD it's far too fragmented!
I don't think there are over 700 derivatives of BSD currently so it should be easier for you to work the puzzle out.
 
Old 05-31-2012, 04:17 PM   #7
nixblog
Member
 
Registered: May 2012
Posts: 426

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by ruario View Post
There are way too many, "we're not Linux" style responses for my liking.
Yes, quite true - and their not!
 
Old 05-31-2012, 04:25 PM   #8
nixblog
Member
 
Registered: May 2012
Posts: 426

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD View Post
They lump together all Linux distros. I really doubt that FreeBSD is more stable than distros like Slackware or RHEL. they also totally "forget" that driver support for Linux is magnitudes better.
I guess stability can come down to the people who set up and maintain a system. A badly setup system will be unstable from time to time regardless if it's Windows, Linux or BSD.

I will give FreeBSD this, I have had several machines that have failed to install Linux for one reason or another, when I offer it a copy of FreeBSD it installs without trouble. This has happened on machines aging from 12 years ago to the present - perhaps I'm just lucky where it comes to FreeBSD?
 
Old 05-31-2012, 04:51 PM   #9
273
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 3,350

Rep: Reputation: 773Reputation: 773Reputation: 773Reputation: 773Reputation: 773Reputation: 773Reputation: 773
Quote:
Originally Posted by nixblog View Post
I don't think there are over 700 derivatives of BSD currently so it should be easier for you to work the puzzle out.
I think I'll stick with completely un-fragmented Debian rather than move to that fragmented BSD.
I must admit though it's so difficult to get support for Debian and so hard to find other users because Slackware and Android exist.
Talk of "Linux fragmentation" may make some sense if you're talking about Windows, OSX or (more particularly iOS) but giving Linux's fragmentation as an argument for running FreeBSD is complete nonsense. I'm willing to bet there are more Debian users than FreeBSD users and possibly more Debian-derivative users than total BSD users.
I'm sure similar can be said of RHES and Redhat-derived distros.

I have nothing against BSD, by the way, and may well try it some day. I also know the anti-Linux comments may well have been tongue-in-cheek as were my comments about BSD fragmentation.
 
Old 05-31-2012, 05:05 PM   #10
anomie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Distribution: RHEL, Scientific Linux, Debian, Fedora, Lubuntu, FreeBSD
Posts: 3,930
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by nixblog
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...tem&px=MTExMDg

Do you agree or disagree with the comments made?
Looks like a fairly trite collection of comments to me. I suspect we're none the wiser for having read it.

For folks like me (who regularly use and deeply appreciate both GNU/Linux and FreeBSD), these sorts of exercises tend to resonate as particularly useless. Do what you like, and make an effort to improve your favorite projects and communities.
 
Old 05-31-2012, 05:14 PM   #11
nixblog
Member
 
Registered: May 2012
Posts: 426

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by 273 View Post
I have nothing against BSD, by the way, and may well try it some day. I also know the anti-Linux comments may well have been tongue-in-cheek as were my comments about BSD fragmentation.
LOL yeah, a lot of BSD'ers run Linux on their desktops too so I guess those comments are made tongue-in-cheek

You should really try FreeBSD, the base installs easier than Debian (and supports WPA/2) and the documentation is as good as any out there.

As Linus says, use whatever gets the job done...
 
Old 05-31-2012, 11:32 PM   #12
PrinceCruise
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: /Universe/Earth/India/Pune
Distribution: Slackware64 14.1/Current, CentOS 6.5/7.0
Posts: 750

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Well, I should be using and learning *BSD, but definitely not for the weird reasons mentioned in that post.

Regards.
 
Old 06-03-2012, 08:55 AM   #13
hitest
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Prince Rupert, B.C., Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD
Posts: 4,163

Rep: Reputation: 527Reputation: 527Reputation: 527Reputation: 527Reputation: 527Reputation: 527
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by nixblog View Post
I will give FreeBSD this, I have had several machines that have failed to install Linux for one reason or another, when I offer it a copy of FreeBSD it installs without trouble. This has happened on machines aging from 12 years ago to the present - perhaps I'm just lucky where it comes to FreeBSD?
I've had the opposite experience with FreeBSD. I'm currently running OpenBSD 5.1 on this aging IBM 850 MHz eServer. FreeBSD will not install on this machine. This is not a criticism of FreeBSD, but, it is a hardware incompatibility. OpenBSD runs like a top on this old box.
Each to his own. I really like FreeBSD and I do maintain a FreeBSD 9.0 VM on my main Slackware work station.
 
Old 06-03-2012, 04:06 PM   #14
nixblog
Member
 
Registered: May 2012
Posts: 426

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by hitest View Post
This is not a criticism of FreeBSD, but, it is a hardware incompatibility. OpenBSD runs like a top on this old box.
Yeah, it's not 100% (nothing is). Glad OpenBSD did the job

I've had FreeBSD run on various old machines but, not older server class hardware.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-03-2012, 05:22 PM   #15
hitest
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Prince Rupert, B.C., Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD
Posts: 4,163

Rep: Reputation: 527Reputation: 527Reputation: 527Reputation: 527Reputation: 527Reputation: 527
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by nixblog View Post
Yeah, it's not 100% (nothing is). Glad OpenBSD did the job
Thanks, man! I'm very happy with OpenBSD.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I'm using freebsd-update with FreeBSD - should I use env_keep in sudoers? pr_deltoid *BSD 1 06-20-2010 10:57 PM
Filesystem Read/Write Support in FreeBSD? / Share files Linux btw FreeBSD pseudonomous *BSD 3 01-29-2009 04:59 AM
LXer: Desktop FreeBSD Part 9: FreeBSD and Broadband LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-31-2007 09:00 AM
updating FreeBSD 6.0 to FreeBSD 6.2 without Console (single user access) kur1j *BSD 2 08-17-2007 07:12 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:30 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration