LinuxQuestions.org
Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Other *NIX Forums > *BSD
User Name
Password
*BSD This forum is for the discussion of all BSD variants.
FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, etc.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 07-25-2010, 06:09 PM   #31
linus72
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Gordonsville-AKA Mayberry-Virginia
Distribution: PocketWriter/MinimalX
Posts: 5,057

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 326Reputation: 326Reputation: 326Reputation: 326

hey ax25nut;
actually I haven't successfully gotten it to install...
every time I put it on usb (dd), it screws up my usb badly.
and it always stops booting on the lappy...

I can't risk putting BSD on any desktop PC as it seems it cant/wont install on a logical partition?
I cant risk BSD wiping out my hdd partitions; so for now it's on indefinite hold
Maybe when BSD becomes more mature I will try it
or when I get a PC that doesn't have important stuff on it...

ax25nut; have you tried the new Bible Edition I made?
http://multidistro.com/NFLUXNEW/SQ4/ubuntu.html

So, as soon as I get another used PC I will be trying one or more of the BSD's
thx
 
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
Old 07-25-2010, 06:36 PM   #32
ax25nut
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Location: Fairfield County, Ohio
Distribution: Several flavors of Linux, BSD Unix, even DOS & Win-doze
Posts: 53
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 17
Hmmm....you might want to simply omit the usb install and make room on the hard disk. No need to eliminate your other installs for that, unless you already have four primary partitions. I once installed pc-bsd to usb stick by simply using uNetBootin in windoze to burn the iso file (not the img file) to the usb stick. I think I still have it. PC-BSD doesn't boot as fast on that usb stick as other stuff does, but it's still usable. Again, your mileage may vary. I have a few installs on the PC-BSD forum that detail how I got my installations to boot. Look up my username (same as here). That might be helpful for your install, but then again, if you're doing a usb install you might have problems. I think my usb stick worked because I formatted it fat32, with boot flag on. Then I used uNetbootin to install to it. Try that if you haven't already and let me know what happens. I've never gotten any multi-boot functionality on usb stix, although I know others have. I didn't use grub on the stik, just a straight install. Enjoy!
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-28-2010, 03:33 PM   #33
pr_deltoid
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2010
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 289

Rep: Reputation: 40
I've gotten FreeBSD working fine now. I'm using Xfce. Very nice. I know that you have to install it to a primary partition, but it is a very nice operating system. Very fast, stable, tons of ports, you have the option of using packages, but I don't, I just install everything from ports. The ports are updated very regularly, and so is everything else. A little more reading to do to figure everything out than some Linux distributions (like Ubuntu, Debian), but it doesn't take very long and it's not very difficult stuff to learn. So far I'd definitely say I prefer it to Linux.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-28-2010, 03:35 PM   #34
linus72
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Gordonsville-AKA Mayberry-Virginia
Distribution: PocketWriter/MinimalX
Posts: 5,057

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 326Reputation: 326Reputation: 326Reputation: 326
prdeltoid;
thats great
The only thing stopping me is...
Quote:
I know that you have to install it to a primary partition
i dont have a free primary partition...yet

Tell me; what kernel does BSD use?
I ask because I want to know if you will try to make a livecd from your system so I can testdrive it live?
 
Old 07-28-2010, 03:42 PM   #35
ocicat
Member
 
Registered: May 2007
Posts: 188

Rep: Reputation: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by linus72 View Post
what kernel does BSD use?
Each *BSD project uses their own. They all descend from one to two common ancestors, but the various *BSD projects have had nearly twenty years now to distinguish their kernels from each other.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-28-2010, 03:44 PM   #36
linus72
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Gordonsville-AKA Mayberry-Virginia
Distribution: PocketWriter/MinimalX
Posts: 5,057

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 326Reputation: 326Reputation: 326Reputation: 326
but can one use a linux kernel source to compile bsd kernel?
 
Old 07-28-2010, 03:49 PM   #37
pr_deltoid
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2010
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 289

Rep: Reputation: 40
No, they're very different.
EDIT:
http://www.freebsd.org/features.html

Last edited by pr_deltoid; 07-28-2010 at 03:55 PM.
 
Old 07-28-2010, 03:55 PM   #38
linus72
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Gordonsville-AKA Mayberry-Virginia
Distribution: PocketWriter/MinimalX
Posts: 5,057

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 326Reputation: 326Reputation: 326Reputation: 326
Well, is there any bsd which will

1) either install to logical partition?
Or
2) not endanger my Linux installs?

Thats why i haven't installed it...
I would lose everything if I misinterpreted something
and BSD took out my Linux partitions(many)

I just need some assurance that i won't lose my data...
Thats why I wish some *BSD had a liveUSB to testdrive...
thx
 
Old 07-28-2010, 03:59 PM   #39
pr_deltoid
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2010
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 289

Rep: Reputation: 40
All I know of is:
http://www.freesbie.org/
and:
http://www.pcbsd.org/

I don't know what the differences are between FreeBSD and PC-BSD, as far as installation options.
Quote:
FreeSBIE is a LiveCD based on the FreeBSD Operating system, or even easier, a FreeBSD-based operating system that works directly from a CD, without touching your hard drive.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-28-2010, 04:08 PM   #40
rocket357
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: 127.0.0.1
Distribution: OpenBSD-CURRENT
Posts: 458
Blog Entries: 66

Rep: Reputation: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by linus72 View Post
what kernel does BSD use?
Well, I guess the correct answer is "modified UCB 4.3BSD" kernels...but each is modified by the respective project.

If I'm not mistaken, the history is as follows: NetBSD started from 4.3BSD (1993). FreeBSD started from the 4.3BSD code after it was ported to the intel 386 platform (386BSD) (1993). OpenBSD forked from NetBSD (1995). DragonflyBSD forked from FreeBSD (2003). The remaining ones (PC-BSD, DesktopBSD, OliveBSD, etc...) are all basically built on top of one of the three early BSD's.

I'm sure there are others, but those are the ones that come to mind.

Quote:
Originally Posted by linus72 View Post
I just need some assurance that i won't lose my data...
Thats why I wish some *BSD had a liveUSB to testdrive...
OpenBSD's bsd.rd installer (the CDROM or when run from a live system), can install to a usb drive without touching anything else...but it won't be a pretty graphical installer or even a pretty graphical system until you've set it up the rest of the way...

Last edited by rocket357; 07-28-2010 at 04:12 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-28-2010, 04:12 PM   #41
pr_deltoid
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2010
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 289

Rep: Reputation: 40
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO...bsd/index.html
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-29-2010, 10:14 AM   #42
linus72
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Gordonsville-AKA Mayberry-Virginia
Distribution: PocketWriter/MinimalX
Posts: 5,057

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 326Reputation: 326Reputation: 326Reputation: 326
Check it out
maybe I found an answer for livecd...
http://www.ghostbsd.org/182/

1,547mb dvd though, do you got to install all of it?
we'll see
 
Old 07-29-2010, 02:25 PM   #43
mreschke
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Distribution: Arch, Ubuntu, LFS
Posts: 17

Rep: Reputation: 3
linus72,

Why don't you just put in another HD in your desktop, even a little 3gigger would work fine. Then you can install BSD without modifying your main HD. I would unplug your main HD first, just so you don't mess something up during install (optional). Once you get BSD installed, plug in your main HD again and setup grub to chainload to the second HD. This is your easiest solution.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-29-2010, 02:31 PM   #44
mreschke
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Distribution: Arch, Ubuntu, LFS
Posts: 17

Rep: Reputation: 3
AND FYI, for the future, always remember that some OS's can only be installed to primary (like MacOS_x86 and BSD). So if you ever setup a desktop again, make 3 primary's and don't install linux/windows on them, save them for BSD. Then the 4rth would be your extended, and 5-15 would be your logical for linux/win. Don't put swap/boot on primary either, just reserve them for BSD.
/dev/sda1 pri 20g (or whatever size)
/dev/sda2 pri 30g (or whatever size)
/dev/sda3 pri 40g (or whatever size)
/dev/sda4 extended
/dev/sda5 log 4G swap
/dev/sda6 log 4G boot (i install a small distro here (as a sort of utility boot OS to fix things), and use as main /boot (grub here, chainloads to other grubs/BSD))
/dev/sda7 log 300G home/storage
/dev/sda8 log 16G linux/win
/dev/sda9 log 16G linux/win
/dev/sda10 log 14G linux/win
/dev/sda11 log 14G linux/win
/dev/sda12 log 12G linux/win
/dev/sda13 log 12G linux/win
/dev/sda14 log 10G linux/win
/dev/sda15 log 10G linux/win

most kernels have a 15 partition limit

or something (sizes can vary of course)

If you got a second HD, you could re-partition like above, then dd your main desktop HD onto all new drive/partitions, clean things up a bit. (a bit advanced though, but nice to re-org)

Last edited by mreschke; 07-29-2010 at 02:35 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-30-2010, 04:34 AM   #45
pr_deltoid
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2010
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 289

Rep: Reputation: 40
Just in case you're looking for it, here's a description of FreeBSD disk organization:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/...anization.html

Last edited by pr_deltoid; 07-30-2010 at 04:36 AM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: PC BSD 8.0 release made BSD much easier for desktop use | Installation and scre LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-26-2010 09:30 AM
PC BSD, Open BSD, or Free BSD ? Alexvader *BSD 5 02-08-2010 01:40 AM
Video For BSD --- New project to develop V4L compatible drivers for BSD Fritz_Katz *BSD 5 07-20-2008 12:53 AM
LXer: PC-BSD : A user friendly BSD flavor geared for the desktop LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-04-2006 04:01 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 PM.

Main Menu
 
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration