LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Other *NIX Forums > *BSD
User Name
Password
*BSD This forum is for the discussion of all BSD variants.
FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, etc.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 04-25-2009, 02:39 PM   #1
pseudonomous
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question about FreeBSD ports / binary packages / intel graphics drivers and Xorg


Hello Everybody!

Sorry to bother people with newbish questions but:

I know FreeBSD provides both binary packages and a collection of ports to assist compilation from source, but are the ports version and the binary packages the same version, I mean, is the binary package just a pre-compiled version of the port?

Edit:

No, by defualt, the binary packages are all the same binary packages provide at the release date of the package.


Also, is the 6.4 "legacy release" considered and officially supported release? In particular, is the ports collection supposed to work with the 6.4 release?

Does either the 7.1 or 6.4 release of FreeBSD use Xorg 1.5 or earlier? How about an intel Xorg driver from before the transition from tungsten to gem?

Edit:

Well the 7.1 release comes with Xserver 1.4.x, and Xorg 7.3.x and intel drivers at 2.4.2, unfortunately, I think those intel drivers are new enough to be using the GEM stuff, I'm not sure about 6.4 yet.

What's the motivation behind asking these questions:

I"m using arch linux now, and migrating through the various releases of new intel graphics drivers and Xorgs has been a real pain in the ass for me, recently, so I'd like to move to linux/BSD distro that's using an older Xorg and intel drivers, but at the same time, I'd like to be able to install other newer software, like Xfce 4.6. I was wondering if I could do this with FreeBSD.

Edit:

It looks like the intel drivers in 7.1 are too new for what I'm trying to do, on the other hand, it looks like I COULD do what I want to do in principle, though I may have to work with the 6.4 release. On the other hand, it looks like Arch Linux also provides a legacy intel driver, and as much as I've always wanted to play around with BSD. I may just give those a shot first.

Thanks!

Last edited by pseudonomous; 04-25-2009 at 03:52 PM.
 
Old 04-26-2009, 12:02 PM   #2
vermaden
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: pl_PL.lodz
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 392

Rep: Reputation: 80
Quote:
I know FreeBSD provides both binary packages and a collection of ports to assist compilation from source, but are the ports version and the binary packages the same version, I mean, is the binary package just a pre-compiled version of the port?
That depends on how old the release is, older release, newer versions in ports, you can also DO NOT update your ports tree to have the same versions.

Quote:
Also, is the 6.4 "legacy release" considered and officially supported release? In particular, is the ports collection supposed to work with the 6.4 release?
Yes, ports tree works even with FreeBSD 4.11 for example.

Quote:
I was wondering if I could do this with FreeBSD.
Yes, you can.
 
Old 04-27-2009, 09:33 AM   #3
jstephens84
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: (Home)Opensolaris, Ubuntu, CentOS, (Work - AIX, HP-UX, Red Hat)
Posts: 2,043

Rep: Reputation: 83
I kinda of have a question that goes anlong with this one. If need be I can open another thread. But I am guessing that pkg_add is used for binary files while you use make install when building from the ports directory. Is that correct?

Not trying to hijack your thread I just thought that this would compliment your thread and save from having to open another thread.
 
Old 04-27-2009, 10:49 AM   #4
anomie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Distribution: RHEL, Scientific Linux, Debian, Fedora, Lubuntu, FreeBSD
Posts: 3,930
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by jstephens84
.. I am guessing that pkg_add is used for binary files while you use make install when building from the ports directory. Is that correct?
Yes. But there are also ports you can install to make the port maintenance process a lot easier. Two examples are portupgrade and portmaster. (The latter is what I use.)
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
working xorg.conf file for Intel 845G Graphics dizzi Linux - Hardware 3 11-06-2007 03:18 PM
Help! Prob w FC6 install - xorg.conf & my Intel 82845G graphics card moose22 Fedora 7 03-29-2007 05:11 AM
FreeBSD packages/ports on a old computer jaakkop *BSD 2 09-16-2006 01:16 AM
FreeBSD - Binary packages question vharishankar *BSD 1 08-10-2006 11:57 AM
PROBLEM!-Slackware10.1/Xorg on Dell Laptop video:intel Extreme Graphics 2 for mobile nofx_scotti Slackware 4 03-16-2005 09:46 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration