*BSD This forum is for the discussion of all BSD variants.
FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, etc. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
02-12-2005, 04:44 PM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Distribution: Debian, Gentoo, Slackware, FreeBSD
Posts: 68
Rep:
|
FreeBSD production server
if i wanted to setup a FreeBSD production server, which version would you suggest? i read some articles talking about how 5.3 isn't production-ready yet.. i don't know much about BSD, so any information would be extremely helpful!
|
|
|
|
02-12-2005, 05:04 PM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Third rock from the Sun
Distribution: NetBSD-2, FreeBSD-5.4, OpenBSD-3.[67], RHEL[34], OSX 10.4.1
Posts: 1,197
Rep:
|
Assuming it's a SMP system, 5.3
|
|
|
|
02-13-2005, 05:15 AM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: BIOS
Distribution: RHEL3.0, FreeBSD 5.x, Debian 3.x, Soaris x86 v10
Posts: 379
Rep:
|
Go for 4.11 version. But if it is SMP then you need to got for 5.3 series as pointed by sigsegv
May be this clear more http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO...ticles/releng/
|
|
|
|
02-13-2005, 09:10 AM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Third rock from the Sun
Distribution: NetBSD-2, FreeBSD-5.4, OpenBSD-3.[67], RHEL[34], OSX 10.4.1
Posts: 1,197
Rep:
|
Since it doesn't really address the question, I doubt it.
Zoso -- Here's the reason that I said what I did.
The 4.XX series has been around a *long* time now (March of 2000), and is considered by most, myself included, to be very "tried and true". It's missing a good bit of "improvements" that are in 5.3 though, as backporting them would be very ugly (or impossible due to major upheaval). It's also (in my experience) faster than 5.x on a uni-processor system.
The 5.X series has a good bit of redesign in the guts of the kernel. It's considered by many to be an improvement over the design of 4.X. It's the faster of the two on SMP systems, largely due to the guts changes. It's not unstable as the articles you mention may have said, and in my experience has been completely rock solid. I have several production systems running 5.3. 4.xx will eventually be an old codebase that they don't make patches for anymore (like 3.x is now), so if you're looking to stay with a single CVS branch for years, 5.x is for sure the way to go.
Not everyone thinks 5.X is good though, and in fact, the direction that 5.X was (is) headed is the whole reason that Matt Dillon started DragonFlyBSD which is what I would actually like to recommend, but the package subsystem is kind of a mess still.
I hope this makes your decision easier.
Last edited by sigsegv; 02-13-2005 at 09:15 AM.
|
|
|
|
02-13-2005, 10:08 AM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Distribution: Debian, Gentoo, Slackware, FreeBSD
Posts: 68
Original Poster
Rep:
|
thanks! i've read the article, and i think i'll take your suggestion and go with DragonFlyBSD, sigsegv. the reason i ask is because a friend asked me to set it up for him using some form of bsd. i told him i wasn't comfortable with it, but he wanted me to do it anyway. again, thanks.. :-)
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|