LinuxQuestions.org
Go Job Hunting at the LQ Job Marketplace
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Other *NIX Forums > *BSD
User Name
Password
*BSD This forum is for the discussion of all BSD variants.
FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, etc.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 01-15-2003, 09:19 AM   #1
Ratclaws
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: New York
Distribution: Slackware 8
Posts: 100

Rep: Reputation: 16
free , open , or net


i was recently using freebsd as my apache/bind/everything server. anyway i had some sort of messed up issue ( probably something i did), and i came to the conclusion that it is going to be easier to wipe it out rather then fix the problem.
I was wondering if i should stay with freebsd , or switch to the another distro.

out of the free distros, what is considered to be the most
a) stable
b) secure (by default, or not by default)
c) portable
 
Old 01-15-2003, 05:23 PM   #2
finegan
Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,700

Rep: Reputation: 57
If you mean portability as in you can yank the drive and throw it in a completely different machine and it'll work fine, then they're all pretty solid in that regard.

Stability and Security are the two prop points of OpenBSD, plus their firewalling rules, ipfilter is just about the easiest to deal with I've seen, and definately has much less complexity than iptables. Heck, all you have to read is chapter 6: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#PF

Cheers,

Finegan
 
Old 01-18-2003, 02:03 AM   #3
wayloud
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle, Washington
Distribution: Red Hat, OpenBSD
Posts: 33

Rep: Reputation: 15
I have used OpenBSD since 2.7 and I can say that it is easily the most secure OS I have used even when compared side by side with FreeBSD. I now run all web appliances on it, in cluding qmail, DNS, Apache, FTP, SSH and firewalls. As a small company I frequently deploy firewalls for small companies (and some larger) using OpenBSD and PF, or IPFilter in some requests. As for stability, well my qmail server handles about 1500 messages a day for about 25 people and has this to say:

$>uptime
11:07PM up 213 days, 21:29, 1 user, load averages: 0.46, 0.38, 0.38

So plainly I am stuck on OpenBSD.

Last edited by wayloud; 01-18-2003 at 02:07 AM.
 
Old 02-17-2003, 01:44 AM   #4
Daemonfly
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 63

Rep: Reputation: 15
I was really considering OpenBSD until I found out it wouldn't make use of my Dual-processor setup
 
Old 02-19-2003, 03:34 AM   #5
TazLinux
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Phoenix
Distribution: Mandrake 9.2
Posts: 228

Rep: Reputation: 30
Linux will.
 
Old 02-19-2003, 06:19 PM   #6
tpro
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Biggs, CA
Distribution: FreeBSD, Slackware
Posts: 36

Rep: Reputation: 15
FreeBSD supports SMP rather easily... uncomment two lines in the GENERIC config and rebuild a new kernel. Super easy to do. Have a Compaq Proliant 5000 with Dual P6-200's in it and FreeBSD 4.7 on it. Runs as smooth as velvet.

tpro
 
Old 02-21-2003, 05:17 AM   #7
5amYan
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: The District
Distribution: FreeBSD, OBSD maybe Gentoo and Winblech XP
Posts: 291

Rep: Reputation: 30
How many servers you know that are documented as up over three years?

http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html

No MINIX clones there.

Last edited by 5amYan; 02-21-2003 at 05:18 AM.
 
Old 02-21-2003, 06:20 AM   #8
finegan
Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,700

Rep: Reputation: 57
I think it was 2.2.14 and below that were open to an attack that required kernel upgrade. Not only that, but the 2.2.x series was the only one with really staying power and it hasn't been around long enough to edge into that list... give it a year though.

Cheers,

Finegan
 
Old 02-21-2003, 10:31 AM   #9
5amYan
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: The District
Distribution: FreeBSD, OBSD maybe Gentoo and Winblech XP
Posts: 291

Rep: Reputation: 30
TYeah I really am teasing. but those at the top of the list have been up over four years. That puts them back in the 3.X branch. 4.x is very mature at 4.7 and 4.8 is due out soon. In another year 5.x may be named stable and those 4.xen aren't going down anytime soon.

If you haven't tried it I highly recommend it, finegan, I think as an advanced linux ser you would enjoy it's stability, maturity, highly organized structure, ease of use and some of the advanced features not found in linux .

Last edited by 5amYan; 02-21-2003 at 02:27 PM.
 
Old 02-22-2003, 05:40 AM   #10
finegan
Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,700

Rep: Reputation: 57
No need to be teasing, you're just dead right, the *BSDs have had more mature networking longer... that's what you get from the fact the Netlink group built the Linux networking stack from scratch and the BSDs had BSD4.4's rock-solid stack to come from. Heck, only in the past two year or so has Linux had the same sort of flexibility to offer. Although I guess being first to stable SMP was what really helped more... FreeBSD is just getting that into stable branching now, and Open and Net have just started tackling the problem. Still, Open claims a working beta SMP by sometime this summer, or autumn...?

I keep trying FreeBSD in fits and starts, usually have bungled net installs that don't leave me enough partitioned space for packages... I've compiled the kernel a couple of times, finally got it to boot SMP once.

Anyway, what am I rambling on about?

Cheers,

Finegan
 
Old 02-28-2003, 05:03 PM   #11
ghight
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Indiana
Distribution: Centos, RedHat Enterprise, Slackware
Posts: 524

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by 5amYan
How many servers you know that are documented as up over three years?

No MINIX clones there.
OUCH!!!!!!!!
 
Old 09-22-2003, 09:11 AM   #12
Sindre
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
fairly new linux kernels (2.4.18'ish) still cycle their uptime at 497 days or so that might be true for older 2.2 kernels to, and in that case, that list doesn't really show anything
 
Old 09-24-2003, 02:01 PM   #13
chort
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Silicon Valley, USA
Distribution: OpenBSD 4.6, OS X 10.6.2, CentOS 4 & 5
Posts: 3,660

Rep: Reputation: 69
OpenBSD is by far the most secure by default and most secure in design, it's probably also the most stable, although FreeBSD is a very stable OS. I can't speak to NetBSD.

NetBSD will run on more platforms than Open or Free, but what is the point unless you mean to run it one something really obscure?

OpenBSD's major drawback is no SMP support yet.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
installed open office from linuxpackages.net, don't know how to open it salviadud Slackware 7 04-15-2005 11:28 AM
Any free CVS host (not SourceForge.net) leduytien Linux - Networking 1 11-01-2004 06:45 PM
Free Windows XP and Visual Studio .Net redhatman Linux - General 1 10-13-2004 09:35 PM
which one ( Free-, Open-, Net-) zmieff *BSD 3 06-18-2004 06:03 PM
free net access for linux coeur_darcy Linux - Networking 1 10-03-2000 09:05 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:58 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration