*BSD This forum is for the discussion of all BSD variants.
FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, etc. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
10-02-2003, 10:49 AM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Distribution: openbsd 3.6, slackware 10.0
Posts: 244
Rep:
|
features in PF that are ! in iptables?
i've been reading the docs on setting up the packet filter on an OBSD system, but i can't tell yet if PF has added functionality over iptables. if you know of any filtering abilities that are unique to OBSD, i would like to hear about them.
thx for reading,
y-p
|
|
|
|
10-02-2003, 05:58 PM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: bsd
Posts: 41
Rep:
|
I believe that pf allows for stateful filtering of all protocols where iptables does not,or needs patching to do full stateful filtering?? I do know that the syntax is way way easier to use ,as it is almost straight english. http://www.benzedrine.cx/pf.html is a very good source for pf info
|
|
|
|
10-03-2003, 01:18 AM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Distribution: openbsd 3.6, slackware 10.0
Posts: 244
Original Poster
Rep:
|
i am to understand that linux can do stateful filtering, but i'm not certain. the more i read about PF, the more i prefer its syntax and setup to that of iptables. time to go back to the docs and get this thing configured...
|
|
|
|
10-03-2003, 11:27 AM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Silicon Valley, USA
Distribution: OpenBSD 4.6, OS X 10.6.2, CentOS 4 & 5
Posts: 3,660
Rep:
|
Well I haven't looked at iptables too closely, but I do know that pf has an ability to allow only authenticated connections with authpf. I'm not aware of a similar function in iptables.
The main advantage of pf as far as I'm concerned is the syntax and keywords are actually readable. iptables is the worst and most obscure command line packet filtering I've seen as far as usability. Oh, also pf is supposedly the fastest of the open source packet filters, but I cannot confirm that.
Last advantage, you don't need multiple confusing chains of rules operating on the same packet. You just write out the commands to do exactly what you want and you don't have to worry about whether it's in the right chain, whether a chain behind it will block the packet, etc.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|