*BSDThis forum is for the discussion of all BSD variants.
FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, etc.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
If for the trial sake only, then Slackware is the closest Linux distro standing next to BSD.
If you really imply to run server then FreeBSD is the best choise. I have FreeBSD 5.3 as server and it behaves absolutely stunning
It's not so much space as a primary partition - you can have oodles of space but if your primes are full, you'll have to redo your disk. If you have a free primary partition, though, go for it. It's different enough that you might pick up some new tricks and perspectives.
That said, you certainly don't *need* to. For a learning experience, killing time, whatever. But there are plenty of things to do besides installing operating systems. (So I hear.)
Originally posted by digiot
But there are plenty of things to do besides installing operating systems. (So I hear.)
Please, share this unfinished proposition of yours.
According to psychology what essentual for human specie is the progress, the race of GETTING. Because after "you got it" we become bored and seek new race for GETTING
Pretty much the same as human females and their race for genocode...
FreeBSD is a much superior OS then GNU/Linux in many ways: stability, security, documentation and package management. Indeed, all the above arguments are arguable... the only 2 Linux distributions that come close are Slackware(stability and simplicity) and Gentoo (portage and documentation), but I still prefer BSD...
Now let's see how long this thread takes till someone flames me .
Distribution: NetBSD x86; Slackware Linsux i686 (A billion kilometers away)
Posts: 101
Rep:
Quote:
Originally posted by SlackerLX If for the trial sake only, then Slackware is the closest Linux distro standing next to BSD.
If you really imply to run server then FreeBSD is the best choise. I have FreeBSD 5.3 as server and it behaves absolutely stunning
FreeBSD = Why? 5 is so unstable it's not funny... you must have the specifically supported hardware or something.
Anyway, if you're familiar with the console, you can use BSD directly, and as implied here Slackware's pretty close the BSD.. (It's what I used before the jump)
Then again, Arch Linux is also close to BSD...
I suggest that if you're going to try a BSD on that 64-bit, try out NetBSD since it'll give you a mouth-ful of BSD action and you gotta love its kernel recompile system.
Originally posted by SlackerLX If for the trial sake only, then Slackware is the closest Linux distro standing next to BSD.
If you really imply to run server then FreeBSD is the best choise. I have FreeBSD 5.3 as server and it behaves absolutely stunning
I notice a lot of people feel Slack is a good comparison, but to me I think Gentoo is a much better comparison. The whole portage concept is very BSD.
Originally posted by Clark Bent I notice a lot of people feel Slack is a good comparison, but to me I think Gentoo is a much better comparison. The whole portage concept is very BSD.
I agree with that. All three have differences and similarities with each other but Gentoo seems more BSD-ish to me in significant ways. Which is not necessarily a good thing from my point of view - though I do prefer any of them to Microhat-like distros. In some cases, wandering about the filesystem and issuing certain commands and dealing with certain files, Slack and BSD might feel closer but I think the overall portage/ports impact makes Gentoo and BSD feel closer. And I gather Daniel Robbins was directly involved with BSD before his Stampede/Gentoo activities. I don't think Patrick Volkerding was into the BSDs to that extent.
However, neither one are really much like BSD, to me. Just far closer than SysV/rpm/corporate distros.
This is all vague, though - I only used Gentoo a little and use BSD less at this point. Just impressions.
BSD, I have tried other linux distributions and it was because of a friends recommendation and support that I know prefer BSD over everything else. Its not just because I am familiar with it, everything BSD stands for and how it operates appeals to me.
I use FreeBSD 5.3 in dual with windows xp and experience no stability issues. I have no reason to try slack(persuaded by a friend) or any other distro if I am so satisfied with bsd.
I just wish they would finally finish development of FreeBSD for PPC so I can buy a sleek Ibook and run FBSD on it.
I am curious...I know OS X was based on FreeBSD but I have never tried it. I wonder how similar they are. Does OS X have a ports collection? Will software made by apple for OS X run on FreeBSD? I don't know that I would have any need to try that...just curious.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.