LinuxQuestions.org
Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Other *NIX Forums > *BSD
User Name
Password
*BSD This forum is for the discussion of all BSD variants.
FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, etc.

Notices

Reply
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 12-20-2011, 08:50 AM   #1
hitest
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Prince Rupert, B.C., Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD
Posts: 3,305

Rep: Reputation: 270Reputation: 270Reputation: 270
Question Favourite BSD?


I am curious as to what type of BSD you prefer and run. I currently run OpenBSD 5.0 on my desktop and FreeBSD 8.2 in a VM.
Happy Holidays, Folks.
 
Old 12-20-2011, 09:07 AM   #2
corp769
Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: /proc/self/
Distribution: Custom version of Fedora 16, 64 bit, custom 3.2.7 kernel
Posts: 5,647
Blog Entries: 9

Rep: Reputation: 913Reputation: 913Reputation: 913Reputation: 913Reputation: 913Reputation: 913Reputation: 913Reputation: 913
I'm running NetBSD on my old firewall. I used to run OpenBSD a while back, but the motherboard went out, and I have been distro swapping ever since.
 
Old 12-20-2011, 09:33 AM   #3
hitest
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Prince Rupert, B.C., Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD
Posts: 3,305

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 270Reputation: 270Reputation: 270
Quote:
Originally Posted by corp769 View Post
I'm running NetBSD on my old firewall.
I neglected to mention that I'm running pfSense on my router/firewall. NetBSD is awesome.
 
Old 12-21-2011, 03:52 AM   #4
ottavio
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Distribution: slackware-current (32bit)
Posts: 133

Rep: Reputation: 20
NetBsd is the only one I have ever used and it will be my fav distro shortly. And please no one come with Mac OS!
 
Old 12-21-2011, 07:57 AM   #5
kfritz
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2006
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD
Posts: 33

Rep: Reputation: 8
OpenBSD because I like the focus on security, and the mailing lists are very enlightening (and very entertaining at times). I run it under KVM on Slackware, on a crappy PIII, and plan to replace my home router sometimerealsoon with it.

Looks like the Slackware users like BSD too.
 
Old 12-21-2011, 08:38 AM   #6
hitest
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Prince Rupert, B.C., Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD
Posts: 3,305

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 270Reputation: 270Reputation: 270
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by kfritz View Post
OpenBSD because I like the focus on security, and the mailing lists are very enlightening (and very entertaining at times). I run it under KVM on Slackware, on a crappy PIII, and plan to replace my home router sometimerealsoon with it.

Looks like the Slackware users like BSD too.
Yeah, the focus on security initially drew me to OpenBSD, I like the concept of secure by default. Yep. I love BSD.
 
Old 12-21-2011, 10:42 AM   #7
anomie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Distribution: RHEL, Debian, FreeBSD
Posts: 3,739
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Personally very fond of FreeBSD. Some of my favorite OpenBSD-spawned projects are ported there - PF and OpenSSH, including the "portable" version, so sshd(8) is not necessarily tied to the base system.
  • The Ports system works really well (if you have the patience for building and compiling source prior to installation). It generally allows for significant customization. It allows one to upgrade production daemons to a new major or minor version without having to install a new OS version. And, so long as you're diligent about reading /usr/ports/UPDATING, things very rarely break.
  • Jails are an extremely handy feature for isolating services and/or end users. They're also baked into the OS. No patching or add-on apps needed.
  • Many aspects of both system and third-party (Ports) daemon behavior can be controlled through a single configuration file.
  • Filesystems are laid out in a sane and predictable way. Upon installing a new Port, you can make an educated guess about where it placed config files, scripts, and/or binaries, and you'll be correct.

I'm running a production FreeBSD host for some Perl developers, another one for an HTTP proxy, and another for Nagios. Sometime after the Xmas break, I'll be deploying redundant OpenLDAP services on FreeBSD. It's not perfect, though. I wish the resources were available to build in better SAN (device drivers, multipathing) support, as I have lamented before. I occasionally donate money and documentation patches to the FreeBSD Foundation, but I believe a major commercial backing will be needed before SAN support is as advanced as it is on, say, RHEL or Debian. Should that day arrive, I'll have several other uses for FreeBSD.

For their parts, I like NetBSD and OpenBSD very much, in concept. I installed the former on a laptop, and found it to be incredibly "lightweight" and quick (subjective). I don't have a lot of interest in trying out the latter, but I still donate to the OpenBSD project because of the fantastic utilities that camp rolls out (which get ported to other OSes).
 
Old 12-21-2011, 03:01 PM   #8
looop
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2011
Location: Denmark
Distribution: Slackware - Mac OS X Lion - RedHat 6 - MS Win 2003 server - A/UX - FreeBSD - FreeNAS - pfsense
Posts: 59

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
As Desktop system: GhostBSD
AS Server System: OpenBSD
AS NAS: FreeNAS
As FireWall System: M0n0Wall or pfSense
 
Old 12-26-2011, 08:40 PM   #9
gezley
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware64, NetBSD, Salix
Posts: 319

Rep: Reputation: 96
NetBSD. Xen support makes it the perfect BSD for me. It's very light and fast, and not far behind OpenBSD in the security ratings I've looked at. In some places I use OpenBSD as a firewall because it has excellent bandwidth-shaping, or packet queueing, and because PF in NetBSD is quite a bit behind the latest OpenBSD release.
 
Old 01-28-2012, 11:36 AM   #10
jarubyh
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2011
Location: $HOME
Distribution: Slackware, FreeBSD, Debian
Posts: 50

Rep: Reputation: 1
I'm surprised by the lack of FreeBSD love going on. I just recently install 9.0 and love it. Fast, stable, professional, there's really no limit to what you can do with it.
 
Old 02-01-2012, 12:02 PM   #11
rocket357
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: 127.0.0.1
Distribution: OpenBSD-CURRENT
Posts: 460
Blog Entries: 67

Rep: Reputation: 70
OpenBSD. I run it on everything except for my daughter's Ubuntu machine and my wife's Win7 machine.
 
Old 02-09-2012, 07:46 AM   #12
hitest
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Prince Rupert, B.C., Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD
Posts: 3,305

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 270Reputation: 270Reputation: 270
I forgot to mention that I'm running FreeBSD (pfSense) on my router/firewall. It has rock solid performance.
 
Old 02-10-2012, 07:35 AM   #13
PrinceCruise
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: /home/pcruise
Posts: 272

Rep: Reputation: 51
I do not wish to start a new thread for just a small query of mine.
I've been testing PC-BSD9.0 in Vmware since some time and when I checked for VLC player in AppCafe, it's 220MB plus.

How will a mere mortal with a poor internet connection in a few kbps be going to install extra apps here? Please enlighten the n00b?

Regards,

Last edited by PrinceCruise; 02-10-2012 at 08:43 AM.
 
Old 02-10-2012, 08:30 AM   #14
rocket357
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: 127.0.0.1
Distribution: OpenBSD-CURRENT
Posts: 460
Blog Entries: 67

Rep: Reputation: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by PrinceCruise View Post
How will a mere mortal with a poor internet connection in a few kbps be going to install extra apps here?
Very slowly, from the sounds of it...unless you can get to a system with fast internet and download all of the packages for your version of PC-BSD and create your own repository (I've never actually done that with PC-BSD, so don't take my word on it, but I've done that for many other BSDs and Linux distros, so it *should* be possible).
 
Old 02-10-2012, 08:45 AM   #15
PrinceCruise
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: /home/pcruise
Posts: 272

Rep: Reputation: 51
Thanks for the quick answer but that's kinda demotivating.
Don't know what else to say. Can it be installed from source like in general Linux?

Regards,
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: PC BSD 8.0 release made BSD much easier for desktop use | Installation and scre LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-26-2010 08:30 AM
PC BSD, Open BSD, or Free BSD ? Alexvader *BSD 5 02-08-2010 12:40 AM
Video For BSD --- New project to develop V4L compatible drivers for BSD Fritz_Katz *BSD 5 07-19-2008 11:53 PM
LXer: PC-BSD : A user friendly BSD flavor geared for the desktop LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-04-2006 03:01 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 PM.

Main Menu
 
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration