*BSDThis forum is for the discussion of all BSD variants.
FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, etc.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
OpenBSD because I like the focus on security, and the mailing lists are very enlightening (and very entertaining at times). I run it under KVM on Slackware, on a crappy PIII, and plan to replace my home router sometimerealsoon with it.
OpenBSD because I like the focus on security, and the mailing lists are very enlightening (and very entertaining at times). I run it under KVM on Slackware, on a crappy PIII, and plan to replace my home router sometimerealsoon with it.
Looks like the Slackware users like BSD too.
Yeah, the focus on security initially drew me to OpenBSD, I like the concept of secure by default. Yep. I love BSD.
Personally very fond of FreeBSD. Some of my favorite OpenBSD-spawned projects are ported there - PF and OpenSSH, including the "portable" version, so sshd(8) is not necessarily tied to the base system.
The Ports system works really well (if you have the patience for building and compiling source prior to installation). It generally allows for significant customization. It allows one to upgrade production daemons to a new major or minor version without having to install a new OS version. And, so long as you're diligent about reading /usr/ports/UPDATING, things very rarely break.
Jails are an extremely handy feature for isolating services and/or end users. They're also baked into the OS. No patching or add-on apps needed.
Many aspects of both system and third-party (Ports) daemon behavior can be controlled through a single configuration file.
Filesystems are laid out in a sane and predictable way. Upon installing a new Port, you can make an educated guess about where it placed config files, scripts, and/or binaries, and you'll be correct.
I'm running a production FreeBSD host for some Perl developers, another one for an HTTP proxy, and another for Nagios. Sometime after the Xmas break, I'll be deploying redundant OpenLDAP services on FreeBSD. It's not perfect, though. I wish the resources were available to build in better SAN (device drivers, multipathing) support, as I have lamentedbefore. I occasionally donate money and documentation patches to the FreeBSD Foundation, but I believe a major commercial backing will be needed before SAN support is as advanced as it is on, say, RHEL or Debian. Should that day arrive, I'll have several other uses for FreeBSD.
For their parts, I like NetBSD and OpenBSD very much, in concept. I installed the former on a laptop, and found it to be incredibly "lightweight" and quick (subjective). I don't have a lot of interest in trying out the latter, but I still donate to the OpenBSD project because of the fantastic utilities that camp rolls out (which get ported to other OSes).
NetBSD. Xen support makes it the perfect BSD for me. It's very light and fast, and not far behind OpenBSD in the security ratings I've looked at. In some places I use OpenBSD as a firewall because it has excellent bandwidth-shaping, or packet queueing, and because PF in NetBSD is quite a bit behind the latest OpenBSD release.
I'm surprised by the lack of FreeBSD love going on. I just recently install 9.0 and love it. Fast, stable, professional, there's really no limit to what you can do with it.
I do not wish to start a new thread for just a small query of mine.
I've been testing PC-BSD9.0 in Vmware since some time and when I checked for VLC player in AppCafe, it's 220MB plus.
How will a mere mortal with a poor internet connection in a few kbps be going to install extra apps here? Please enlighten the n00b?
Regards,
Last edited by PrinceCruise; 02-10-2012 at 08:43 AM.
How will a mere mortal with a poor internet connection in a few kbps be going to install extra apps here?
Very slowly, from the sounds of it...unless you can get to a system with fast internet and download all of the packages for your version of PC-BSD and create your own repository (I've never actually done that with PC-BSD, so don't take my word on it, but I've done that for many other BSDs and Linux distros, so it *should* be possible).
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.