LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > HCL > Cameras > HP
User Name
Password

Notices

Search · Register · Submit New Product ·
 

HP hp photosmart 435
Reviews Views Date of last review
1 2983 02-20-2005
spacer
Recommended By Average Price Average Rating
No recommendations $120.00 2.0



Description: digikam supports the camera

under suse 9.0, suseplugger will automatically detect the camera when you connect it to the usb port. if it doesn't, try as root. in the setup menu of the camera set the 'usb configuration' to 'digital camera (ptp)'.
Keywords: hp photosmart digital camera
Connection Type: usb


Author
Post A Reply 
Old 02-20-2005, 06:58 AM   #1
blackwindds
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Red Hat Linux 9.0
Posts: 1
Would you recommend the product? no | Price you paid?: $120.00 | Rating: 2

Kernel (uname -r): 2.4.20-8
Distribution: Red Hat 9.0



[Log in to get rid of this advertisement]
I tried usb connection method posted in www.tldp.org, which worked for my Sony Digital Camcorder (which has digital still camera functionality with Memory Stick, etc). However, HP Photosmart 435 didn't work smartly. Alas, what a contradiction!

I even tried it with my other machine (MS Windows Me after installing the install CD), but that didn't work either. Of course, I tried both USB drive mode and PTP(?) mode, but all failed.

I hoped using flash memory card (SD card - sold separately) would improve the situation, but in vain. Since I already purchased the flash card, I went for one more step. Card reader (SanDisk ImageMate 5-in-1: SDDR-99), which worked. So, there must be something wrong in the USB interface of my particular camera or HP Photosmart 435 in general. I added the review of SDDR-99 in other section on this site if you want more info on it.

Most importantly, the quality of the picture was far from satisfying. I thought 3MP was decent grade but it was not. The picture size is huge (much bigger than my 19" monitor), but the image is vague in 1:1 zoom. If you shrink it (zoom out) to make it to look as small as regular picture size (4" x 4"??), then it becomes tolerable, but still not satisfying.

In conclusion, it's not worth $120. I got it for free from a friend since she had several digital cameras and never needed this one. If you want to buy a digital camera, add $100 more and get a decent one. Otherwise, you will waste $120.

I wouldn't spend more than $10 for this camera. Well, I already spent $40 for flash card and $20 for card reader, but I can use them for other future camera or as external USB disk at least.
 is offline    





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:42 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
RSS2  LQ Podcast
RSS2  LQ Radio
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration