LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.

Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.

You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!

Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.

Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto | Site FAQ | Sitemap | Register Now

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.

Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > HCL > Network Cards > Dlink
User Name
Password

Search · Register · Submit New Product ·
 

D-Link DGE-530T
Reviews Views Date of last review
12 12053 02-22-2008
spacer
Recommended By Average Price Average Rating
58% of reviewers $34.66 4.5



Description: D-Link DGE-530T Network Interface Card
PCI 32-bit Bus
10/100/1000 Mbps

Boxed with drivers for:
- Linux (tested with Slackware 10.0, 2.4.26 kernel)
- Windows (tested with Win2000)
- Netware

LEDs:
- Link/Activity
- Full duplex
- 1000 Mbps
- 10/100 Mbps

Supports:
- Wake-On-Lan
- IEEE 802.3x / ACPI 2.0
- SNMP V1
- 802.1Q VLAN
- 802.1p Priority Tags
- Universal Bus Support 3.3V and 5V
Keywords: NIC 10/100/1000Mbps PCI
/sbin/lspci output: 02:0b.0 Ethernet controller: D-Link System Inc: Unknown device 4c00 (rev 11)
Connection Type: PCI


Author
Post A Reply 
Old 06-17-2005, 06:11 PM   #1
elfoozo
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Distribution: debian unstable
Posts: 160
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: $54.00 | Rating: 1

Kernel (uname -r): 2.4.26
Distribution: DamnSmallLinux 1.1



[Log in to get rid of this advertisement]
This card was auto-detected and configured for DHCP like you would expect so it seemed like it would work at first.

I tried using several cross-over cables to get two of these cards working between a DamnSmall node and a Windows 2003 server. It would grab a DHCP IP OK and seem to be alive and working but would not communicate properly. PING's to or from the 2003 server would lock up the DamnSmallLinux node.

Thinking it was an OS glitch of some sort, I tried the same configuration with two DamnSmallLinux clients. I got the same results so I tried 5 other cards paired differently between the nodes. I also tried it on Knoppix 3.7. And finally gave up after recompiling my debian 2.6.10 to include support for this card and it still would freeze the machine on a PING.
 is offline    
Old 02-03-2006, 04:51 PM   #2
lipidinc
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Distribution: Fedora 4
Posts: 6
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: $19.99 | Rating: 9

Kernel (uname -r): 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4
Distribution: Fedora 4


This card worked right out of the box.

The only problem I had was when I upgrade the kernel using built-in Fedora updater, the card no longer recieves power from my mother board (Asus K7V), I don't know why. It could be a driver issue with the kernel or with my motherboard, and the board is 5 years old so that could very well be the case.
 is offline    
Old 04-04-2006, 08:32 PM   #3
elfoozo
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Distribution: debian unstable
Posts: 160
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 0

Kernel (uname -r):
Distribution:


There must have been a typo... I wouldn't recommend this card.
 is offline    
Old 04-04-2006, 08:34 PM   #4
elfoozo
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Distribution: debian unstable
Posts: 160
Would you recommend the product? no | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 0

Kernel (uname -r):
Distribution:


doh!... I see the drop down yes/no now... No! x 3.
 is offline    
Old 04-10-2006, 01:47 PM   #5
walden91
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Posts: 1
Would you recommend the product? no | Price you paid?: $29.99 | Rating: 0

Kernel (uname -r): 2.4
Distribution: fedora core 1


Still does not get auto detected, is not on the fedora drop down list for manuall config, now i have to get a router, my ISP does not utilize DHCP.
 is offline    
Old 08-05-2006, 11:52 PM   #6
spuzzzzzzz
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 465
Would you recommend the product? no | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 1

Kernel (uname -r): 2.6.16.27
Distribution: Slackware


I read that this card was supported by the skge driver in 2.6 kernels, so I bought one. It turns out, D-Link has secretly changed their card. I actually got a D-Link 530T (rev 11) which is sufficiently different from a "normal" D-Link 530T that it doesn't work (pci id is 1186,4b01 instead of 1186,4c00)
 is offline    
Old 11-08-2006, 07:30 AM   #7
synpse
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Distribution: CentOS
Posts: 25
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 9

Kernel (uname -r): 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp
Distribution: Cent OS 4.4


[root@www ~]# lspci
03:06.0 Ethernet controller: D-Link System Inc Gigabit Ethernet Adapter (rev 11)

[root@www ~]# lspci -n
03:06.0 Class 0200: 1186:4c00 (rev 11)

[root@www ~]# dmesg
skge eth0: enabling interface
skge eth0: Link is up at 1000 Mbps, full duplex, flow control tx and rx

[root@www etc]# cat modprobe.conf
alias eth0 skge

eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr xxxxxx
inet addr:xxxxxx Bcast:xxxxx Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: xxxxxxx/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:11738587 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:6720425 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:2568087037 (2.3 GiB) TX bytes:3320361771 (3.0 GiB)
Interrupt:209

CentOS likes to use the SKGE driver and RedHat ES likes to use the sk98lin driver. Everything seems to be OK so far.. no major problems with anything.
 is offline    
Old 03-27-2007, 02:23 PM   #8
sjzabel
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 2
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 9

Kernel (uname -r): 2.6.17-11-generic
Distribution: Ubuntu


Instructions/Documentation: Good

I receive an obscure error while trying to install via the package that came with the product. However when I did wht I should have (go out to the site and get the latest version of the sk98lin drivers :P) everything worked like a charm.
 is offline    
Old 06-04-2007, 10:10 AM   #9
pingdavid
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 0
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 0

Kernel (uname -r):
Distribution:


I purchased a revision 11 version of this card, and it would not work with any linux drivers. I think it was a Class 0200: 1186:4b00 (rev 11).

I am using CentOS 4 U4, and I tried the drivers that came with the kernel, namely, skge and sk98lin. Neither of them worked. Then, I tried downloading the linux driver from DLink and installing that. I got compile errors. So, that one would not work either.

I called DLink support, and they said that they are not supporting this card on Linux. I returned the card.

By the way, kudzu recognized the card, but it tried to load the sky2 driver for this card. This failed with errors.
 is offline    
Old 07-02-2007, 02:43 AM   #10
Kanon
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 106
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 5

Kernel (uname -r):
Distribution: Debian etch


Just got this card and installed it on a fresh machine 0 problems.
BUT it only runs at 100Mbps. I cant get it up to 1G. :(

ethtool -s eth0 speed 1000 duplex full
 is offline    
Old 09-21-2007, 04:18 AM   #11
TylerD75
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 89
Would you recommend the product? no | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 1

Kernel (uname -r): 2.6.21
Distribution: Gentoo


I've had 3 cards of this type, and all the time I've had a wide range of problems.
DHCP not working properly, packet loss and no DHCP recieved ip over (3 different) hubs and switches.
I've tried several kernels and the problems persists. After changeing it to an OLD card I had lying around the problems vanished!
So I would NOT recommend this cheap crap! I've been yelling at my poor ISP for 2 years because of these problems, as I thought there was not a chance that 3 cards could have the same problem.
 is offline    
Old 02-22-2008, 11:04 AM   #12
cjcox
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 244
Would you recommend the product? no | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 1

Kernel (uname -r): 2.6.18.8-0.8-default
Distribution: openSUSE


Newer versions of this card do not seem to work with Linux.
 is offline    






Add LQ To Your Yahoo Add LQ To Your Google Add LQ To Your MSN Add LQ To Your Blog
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:31 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
RSS2  LQ Podcast
RSS2  LQ Radio
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration