LinuxQuestions.org
LinuxAnswers - the LQ Linux tutorial section.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > HCL > Video Devices > Ati
User Name
Password

Notices

Search · Register · Submit New Product ·
  · Next Product »

Sapphire Radeon 9600 Atlantis 256MB
Reviews Views Date of last review
4 4924 06-12-2006
spacer
Recommended By Average Price Average Rating
50% of reviewers $153.33 6.5



Description: Sapphire's Atlantis 9600 256MB graphic card. uses the 9600 chipset works with standard radeon drivers
Keywords: Radeon, 9600, Atlantis, 256MB
/sbin/lspci output: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 4150
Connection Type: AGP 3.0


Author
Post A Reply 
Old 01-15-2005, 05:17 PM   #1
bobbens
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: Debian, FreeBSD, Gentoo
Posts: 586
Thanked: 0
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: $160.00 | Rating: 9

Kernel (uname -r): 2.6.7-1-386
Distribution: Debian Sarge



[Log in to get rid of this advertisement]
Sorta a hassle to set up the drivers, but once set up they work ok. Haven't tested them on a new 3d game, but tuxracer and glmatrix work like a charm. Using the official drivers from www.ati.com .

With 8.8.25 i'm getting 1330 fps in glxgears.
 is offline    
Old 07-15-2005, 09:33 AM   #2
Waerner
 
Registered: May 2005
Distribution: Ubuntu 6.06
Posts: 92
Thanked: 0
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: $140.00 | Rating: 9

Kernel (uname -r): 2.6.10-5-amd64-generic
Distribution: Ubuntu 5.04 Hoary Hedgehog


Works fine for me, the only problem I've noticed was when I tried to install the official drivers.
It created a conflict with a libmesa-package, but I just added the --force-overwrite parameter to fix it - and nothing else has crashed yet :)

EDIT: The Atlantis version is also known as Sapphire Radeon 9600 SE
 is offline    
Old 10-15-2005, 12:39 AM   #3
WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Distribution: Fedora Core 5,4,3 & Ubuntu 6.06
Posts: 398
Thanked: 0
Would you recommend the product? no | Price you paid?: $160.00 | Rating: 2

Kernel (uname -r):
Distribution: Fedora Core 4


Im fed up !!!

The fault is not because of the card, dont get me wront, its an awsome Graphics card. The problem is the Drivers ATI provides for linux. I had installed this card on Fedora Core 3 previously without much sweat using ATI's proprietry drivers and had the card supercharged. DOOM3 on linux was soooooo awsome, it ran faster that it used to run when i played it on XP !!!! But now with FC4 im stuck with a set of drivers that refuse to install properly. If ur reading this review and havnt bought the card urself, dont !!! ur beter off with an NVidia card :(
 is offline    
Old 06-12-2006, 05:21 AM   #4
WinterAyars
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 0
Thanked: 0
Would you recommend the product? no | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 6

Kernel (uname -r): 2.6.16.20
Distribution: Slackware


Well, let's see... It's a nice card, particularly if you want silence as you can acquire them with entirely passive cooling systems. That means you don't have any of that noisy and annoying fan whine you get with a lot of other cards--particularly the more heavy-duty ones. It's not that expensive, although i'm pretty sure you can find them for quite a bit less than the prices listed here these days. All in all, it's a great mix of power and price and it's easy to live with too.

If, that is, you're using it in Windows.

You see, there's a problem--and no, ATI has not given any indication they will fix it, so don't expect they'll haul you out here. The problem is the really quite rubbish ATI drivers that come with it--and, since it's a modern video card, you can't get FOSS alternative drivers. About the only good thing to say about it is that each new driver release offers quite a bit of improvement.

In 2.4.xxx kernels i managed to come up with around 1,300 fps in glxgears. Note, however, that you can do better than this: by careful configuration, installation of new software, and attention to detail i managed to push it up to nearly 2,000 fps. But for real world use you're going to be looking at something closer to the 1,300 range. At least, for the present drivers.

Sure, you could just forget the performance and go for it for its other advantages--but then it stops being an economical choice and starts losing out to a host of other cards. Cards that were made five years prior to this one. About the only thing you get is the lack of cooling fan, if you get one that doesn't require it.

If this were all there was on the market it would be fine, if not as good as it could be. But you can do better.

If ATI were to get their act together then this would jump up two or three rating points and get a recommend out of me. But i wouldn't count on it. You can do much better with NVidia if you want performance, and a whole host of alternatives if you want financial efficiency or FOSS purity. (No, the drivers are not FOSS or anything even resembling it.)
 is offline    





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:50 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
RSS2  LQ Podcast
RSS2  LQ Radio
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration