Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid? (in USD): $50.00 | Rating: 10
Kernel (uname -r):
Linux version 2.4.21-15.0.3.EL (bhcompile@daffy.perf.redhat.com) (gcc version 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-37)) #1 Tue Jun 29 18:17:52 EDT 2004
Distribution:
Redhat WS 3.0
no problems doing config through Mozilla at all. Standard TCP/IP config from my all Intel box through a Linksys LNE100 NIC (using the TULIP driver). It serves a D-Link DWL-2100AP access point on the other side of my house without issue
Would you recommend the product? no | Price you paid? (in USD): None indicated | Rating: 2
Kernel (uname -r):
2.4.31
Distribution:
Slackware 10.2
Performance of the DI-524 was marginal before I upgraded the firmware from version 1.03 to 1.23. That is, the wireless connection was dropped every two hours or so and the only remedy seemed to be to power cycle the DI-524. After upgrading the firmware, it exhibits the same behavior and I can no longer use Firefox to set encryption parameters on the configuration page. I can set these parameters from a SnotBox using Internet Explorer. Short of someone putting a gun to my head, I would never use IE or any of the other crud shoveled up by Micro$not for that matter. If I could revert to the 1.03 firmware, I would be a little happier, but so far 3 e-mail messages to Dlink technical support requesting the 1.03 firmware have led nowhere.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.