LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > HCL > Modems > Actiontek
User Name
Password

Notices

Search · Register · Submit New Product ·
 

Actiontec GT701WG
Reviews Views Date of last review
8 45664 08-10-2006
spacer
Recommended By Average Price Average Rating
75% of reviewers $59.00 5.6



Description: The Actiontec GT701-wg is a great ADSL modem/gateway, it allows non-windows setup via the default gateway IP address,
192.168.0.1

It's the latest modem used by qwest.net (as of 06/2004)

and offers connection to 2 PCs (USB and Ethernet) out of the box, and you can add more via built in wireless networking or an Ethernet hub.

You can purchase this modem from QWEST.net for 59.99 USD.
Keywords: actiontec wireless gateway modem ethernet ADSL
Connection Type: Ethernet, USB, ADSL, and wireless.


Author
Post A Reply 
Old 06-28-2004, 12:11 PM   #1
webgovernor
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Distribution: Ubuntu 8.04 LTS, Gentoo (various)
Posts: 28

Rep: Reputation:
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid? (in USD): $59.99 | Rating: 9

Kernel (uname -r): 2.6
Distribution: Mandrake 10.0



Great Modem/ Gateway,
Works great via ethernet, but you'll need non-existent drivers for
linux if you want to use the USB connection.

It also has a great build in firewall, and it's supports all wireless encryption types to date.

Great Modem/Gateway...
 
Old 08-23-2004, 09:00 PM   #2
alphaproject
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Distribution: Fedora Core 3 x86_64
Posts: 19

Rep: Reputation: Reputation:
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid? (in USD): $60.00 | Rating: 9

Kernel (uname -r): 2.6.5
Distribution: Fedora Core 2


Great modem, no problems at all at setup. Using an ethernet connection.
 
Old 02-09-2005, 10:56 PM   #3
niverson
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: Fedora Core 4
Posts: 128

Rep: Reputation: Reputation: Reputation:
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid? (in USD): $60.00 | Rating: 2

Kernel (uname -r): 2.4.22-1.2199.nptl
Distribution: Fedora Core 1, 3


This modem is useable, but only if you will not want to do port forwarding of standard ports (apache, ssh). I have port forwarding working for a bitTorrent server(port 6881:6999). However I haven't been able to get the modem to forward ports 80(apache) or port 22(ssh). I have read it can be done by setting up a system on DMZ. The question I ask is why does the modem manufacturer make it so difficult to do port forwarding? Instead of setting up DMZ, just get an ADSL bridge modem and set the linux firewall of the system connected to the modem to high and only open the ports you want exposed to the outside world. I despies manufactures that add "functionality" that puts artificial restriction on users becuase the telco's don't want users to run home servers.
 
Old 05-17-2005, 08:30 PM   #4
six6
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Distribution: Debian Sarge & Ubuntu Breezy
Posts: 107

Rep: Reputation: Reputation: Reputation: Reputation:
Would you recommend the product? no | Price you paid? (in USD): $55.00 | Rating: 4

Kernel (uname -r): 2.6.11 custom
Distribution: Debian


I had this connected via ethernet to a computer, and I had one wireless Linux client. If the computer connected via ethernet was running Linux, the wireless client could also connect. If the computer connected via ethernet was running Windows, the wireless client couldn't *ever* connect.

The modem connection would require a reset every 24-48 hours. I called Qwest multiple times. Short answer: we don't support Linux.

I sent it back, got a Zoom X5, and haven't had to reset the connection or worry something can't connect for over a year. It works flawlessly, though Qwest won't *say* that the X5 works :) (they can't support anything they don't sell/receive funding for)
 
Old 11-26-2005, 10:57 AM   #5
akniss
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Ubuntu 5.10 (Breezy Badger)
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: Reputation: Reputation: Reputation: Reputation:
Would you recommend the product? no | Price you paid? (in USD): $60.00 | Rating: 4

Kernel (uname -r): 2.6.12-10-386
Distribution: Ubuntu 5.10 (Breezy Badger)


Took a long time and much head-banging to get this to work with ethernet connection. Several problems with nameserver assignments that people have found workarounds for. Still have not been able to get wireless working after a couple weeks of trying. Neither Qwest nor Actiontec are very helpful unless you are using Mac or Windows.
 
Old 05-26-2006, 09:21 PM   #6
zcorker
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Distribution: Debbian
Posts: 21

Rep: Reputation: Reputation: Reputation: Reputation: Reputation: Reputation:
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid? (in USD): None indicated | Rating: 4

Kernel (uname -r): SUSE Linux
Distribution: 10.0


I am a newbie and don't know if I should even be listing my kernel or distribution. The Actiontech GT701-wg only has one port if you get the modem from Qwest. However, if you buy the same modem from Best Buy it has 4 ports. However, Best Buy wants $79.

I think there are better choices out there. I do have a question about running the
GT701-wg with a wireless adapter for a desktop and was wondering what Adapters will work with both Linux and Windows? Also, I was wondering if anyone had a suggestion on where to get that X-5 and who makes it?

I am a real newbie so please bear with me.

ZCorker
<rjs4you @ juno.com>
 
Old 08-10-2006, 03:10 PM   #7
 
Registered: Dec 1969
Posts: 0

Rep: Reputation: Reputation: Reputation: Reputation: Reputation: Reputation: Reputation:
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid? (in USD): None indicated | Rating: 7

Kernel (uname -r):
Distribution:


The actiontec is actually running a Linux kernel (version 2.4.17) see: http://sub.st/articles/hacking-the-actiontec-gt701/

Thats why its difficult to forward the privleged ports but can still be done (you can telnet to it, ftp, etc.) For port forwarding to work you must set the firewall level to "basic".

As far as nameserver issues - clients that do DHCP requests to it are given the modem as the DNS server, not the actual ISP DNS address. To work around this put the ISP DNS ip's in resolv.conf
 
Old 08-10-2006, 03:31 PM   #8
 
Registered: Dec 1969
Posts: 0

Rep: Reputation: Reputation: Reputation: Reputation: Reputation: Reputation: Reputation: Reputation:
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid? (in USD): None indicated | Rating: 0

Kernel (uname -r):
Distribution:


Also the modem does support bridging mode but Qwest as an isp doesn't - you have to use a smaller ISP to get bridging service. You can lease static ip's from qwest.

The best DSL modem of all time is the Cisco 678!
 




  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:03 AM.

Main Menu

My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration